Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method
Background and objective: Moderate debt usage increases returns during economic boom, but high debt could decreases returns during economic recession. This study examines if there is a threshold debt level in the debt-returns relationship. Methodology: This study applies dynamic panel-threshold meth...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Asian Network for Scientific Information
2016
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/1/Non-linearity%20in%20debt%20and%20return%20relationship.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/ http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2016.438.444 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.upm.eprints.53393 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.533932017-10-26T05:03:03Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/ Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde Amin Noordin, Bany Ariffin Wan Ngah, Wan Azman Saini Md Nasir, Annuar Background and objective: Moderate debt usage increases returns during economic boom, but high debt could decreases returns during economic recession. This study examines if there is a threshold debt level in the debt-returns relationship. Methodology: This study applies dynamic panel-threshold method to determine optimal debt level beyond which further increases in debt decreases returns. This study finds a threshold effect of 20.570% between debt ratio and return on equity. If the debt ratio is lower than 20.570%, a 1% increases in debt ratio increase return on equity by 0.128%. But, when the debt ratio is higher than 20.570%, a 1% increase in debt ratio decreases return on equity by 0.050%. Results: The results suggest that there is an optimal debt ratio of 20.570% at which point further increase in debt decreases return on equity. Conclusion: These results support the tradeoff theory, which suggests that there is an optimum debt level that maximizes returns. Asian Network for Scientific Information 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/1/Non-linearity%20in%20debt%20and%20return%20relationship.pdf Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde and Amin Noordin, Bany Ariffin and Wan Ngah, Wan Azman Saini and Md Nasir, Annuar (2016) Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method. Journal of Applied Sciences, 16 (9). pp. 438-444. ISSN 1812-5654; ESSN: 1812-5662 http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2016.438.444 10.3923/jas.2016.438.444 |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Background and objective: Moderate debt usage increases returns during economic boom, but high debt could decreases returns during economic recession. This study examines if there is a threshold debt level in the debt-returns relationship. Methodology: This study applies dynamic panel-threshold method to determine optimal debt level beyond which further increases in debt decreases returns. This study finds a threshold effect of 20.570% between debt ratio and return on equity. If the debt ratio is lower than 20.570%, a 1% increases in debt ratio increase return on equity by 0.128%. But, when the debt ratio is higher than 20.570%, a 1% increase in debt ratio decreases return on equity by 0.050%. Results: The results suggest that there is an optimal debt ratio of 20.570% at which point further increase in debt decreases return on equity. Conclusion: These results support the tradeoff theory, which suggests that there is an optimum debt level that maximizes returns. |
format |
Article |
author |
Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde Amin Noordin, Bany Ariffin Wan Ngah, Wan Azman Saini Md Nasir, Annuar |
spellingShingle |
Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde Amin Noordin, Bany Ariffin Wan Ngah, Wan Azman Saini Md Nasir, Annuar Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
author_facet |
Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde Amin Noordin, Bany Ariffin Wan Ngah, Wan Azman Saini Md Nasir, Annuar |
author_sort |
Matemilola, Bolaji Tunde |
title |
Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
title_short |
Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
title_full |
Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
title_fullStr |
Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
title_sort |
non-linearity in debt and return relationship: evidence from dynamic panel threshold method |
publisher |
Asian Network for Scientific Information |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/1/Non-linearity%20in%20debt%20and%20return%20relationship.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/53393/ http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2016.438.444 |
_version_ |
1643835383153164288 |