Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals

Limited studies have investigated the relative influence of both external and internal factors in the implementation of community-based urban agriculture (UA) (ICUA). Furthermore, little research exists explaining how different mechanisms might influence urban residents’ decision to participate in U...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiraieyari, Neda, Karami, Roya, Ricard, Robert M., Badsar, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/1/77836.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1422
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Language: English
id my.upm.eprints.77836
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.778362020-05-04T16:57:15Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/ Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals Tiraieyari, Neda Karami, Roya Ricard, Robert M. Badsar, Mohammad Limited studies have investigated the relative influence of both external and internal factors in the implementation of community-based urban agriculture (UA) (ICUA). Furthermore, little research exists explaining how different mechanisms might influence urban residents’ decision to participate in UA. Our research tested the direct effect of several predictors on ICUA using structural equational modelling. In addition, we tested the mediation effect between the predictors and the ICUA that may exist as well. Results are based on data from 200 agricultural professionals in the Zanjan province in northwest Iran. We found that “personal characteristics”, “UA positive and negative consequences”, “sociocultural”, and “economic” factors affect ICUA. Among all factors, “personal characteristics” had the strongest direct effect on ICUA. The indirect model incorporating “attitude” provided support for the mediation model. We found “personal characteristics”, “UA positive and negative consequences”, and “sociocultural” influenced ICUA indirectly through “attitude.” Among all factors, “sociocultural” had the strongest indirect effect on ICUA. This information is of use to policy-makers and program planners in identifying points of policy interventions and mechanisms for promoting UA. MDPI 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/1/77836.pdf Tiraieyari, Neda and Karami, Roya and Ricard, Robert M. and Badsar, Mohammad (2019) Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals. Sustainability, 11 (5). art. no. 1422. pp. 1-18. ISSN 2071-1050 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1422 10.3390/su11051422
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Limited studies have investigated the relative influence of both external and internal factors in the implementation of community-based urban agriculture (UA) (ICUA). Furthermore, little research exists explaining how different mechanisms might influence urban residents’ decision to participate in UA. Our research tested the direct effect of several predictors on ICUA using structural equational modelling. In addition, we tested the mediation effect between the predictors and the ICUA that may exist as well. Results are based on data from 200 agricultural professionals in the Zanjan province in northwest Iran. We found that “personal characteristics”, “UA positive and negative consequences”, “sociocultural”, and “economic” factors affect ICUA. Among all factors, “personal characteristics” had the strongest direct effect on ICUA. The indirect model incorporating “attitude” provided support for the mediation model. We found “personal characteristics”, “UA positive and negative consequences”, and “sociocultural” influenced ICUA indirectly through “attitude.” Among all factors, “sociocultural” had the strongest indirect effect on ICUA. This information is of use to policy-makers and program planners in identifying points of policy interventions and mechanisms for promoting UA.
format Article
author Tiraieyari, Neda
Karami, Roya
Ricard, Robert M.
Badsar, Mohammad
spellingShingle Tiraieyari, Neda
Karami, Roya
Ricard, Robert M.
Badsar, Mohammad
Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
author_facet Tiraieyari, Neda
Karami, Roya
Ricard, Robert M.
Badsar, Mohammad
author_sort Tiraieyari, Neda
title Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
title_short Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
title_full Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
title_fullStr Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
title_full_unstemmed Influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
title_sort influences on the implementation of community urban agriculture: insights from agricultural professionals
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2019
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/1/77836.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77836/
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1422
_version_ 1665896044356960256