Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils
Chemical fertilizers are important for improving crop yield. However, fertilizers cost, concerns for sustainable soil and crop productivity, ecological stability, and economic viability have been expressed. A field study was carried out on Bekenu Series (Typic Paleudults) to determine the effects of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Agricultural Academy
2019
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/1/Economic%20viability%20of%20including%20crude%20humic%20substances%2C%20chicken%20litter%20biochar%2C%20and%20clinoptilolite%20zeolite%20in%20rice%20cultivation%20on%20acid%20soils%20.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/ https://www.agrojournal.org/25/01-12.html |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.upm.eprints.79471 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.794712021-05-25T23:37:09Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/ Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils Palanivell, Perumal Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna Omar, Latifah Nik Ab. Majid, Nik Muhamad Chemical fertilizers are important for improving crop yield. However, fertilizers cost, concerns for sustainable soil and crop productivity, ecological stability, and economic viability have been expressed. A field study was carried out on Bekenu Series (Typic Paleudults) to determine the effects of (i) using conventional fertilizers, crude humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils, and (ii) the economic viability of including the soil amendments in rice cultivation. Results revealed that long-term cultivation of rice based on conventional method is not economically sustainable. Regardless of cropping cycle, crude humic substances were economically viable. Farmers who include chicken litter biochar or clinoptilolite zeolite in their rice cultivation can breakeven in the second and third field planting cycles. Incorporating crude humic substances is the most economical practice in rice cultivation followed by chicken littler biochar or clinoptilolite zeolite. Agricultural Academy 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/1/Economic%20viability%20of%20including%20crude%20humic%20substances%2C%20chicken%20litter%20biochar%2C%20and%20clinoptilolite%20zeolite%20in%20rice%20cultivation%20on%20acid%20soils%20.pdf Palanivell, Perumal and Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna and Omar, Latifah and Nik Ab. Majid, Nik Muhamad (2019) Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25 (1). pp. 79-96. ISSN 1310-0351 https://www.agrojournal.org/25/01-12.html |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Chemical fertilizers are important for improving crop yield. However, fertilizers cost, concerns for sustainable soil and crop productivity, ecological stability, and economic viability have been expressed. A field study was carried out on Bekenu Series (Typic Paleudults) to determine the effects of (i) using conventional fertilizers, crude humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils, and (ii) the economic viability of including the soil amendments in rice cultivation. Results revealed that long-term cultivation of rice based on conventional method is not economically sustainable. Regardless of cropping cycle, crude humic substances were economically viable. Farmers who include chicken litter biochar or clinoptilolite zeolite in their rice cultivation can breakeven in the second and third field planting cycles. Incorporating crude humic substances is the most economical practice in rice cultivation followed by chicken littler biochar or clinoptilolite zeolite. |
format |
Article |
author |
Palanivell, Perumal Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna Omar, Latifah Nik Ab. Majid, Nik Muhamad |
spellingShingle |
Palanivell, Perumal Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna Omar, Latifah Nik Ab. Majid, Nik Muhamad Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
author_facet |
Palanivell, Perumal Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna Omar, Latifah Nik Ab. Majid, Nik Muhamad |
author_sort |
Palanivell, Perumal |
title |
Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
title_short |
Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
title_full |
Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
title_fullStr |
Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
title_sort |
economic viability of including humic substances, chicken litter biochar, and clinoptilolite zeolite in rice cultivation on acid soils |
publisher |
Agricultural Academy |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/1/Economic%20viability%20of%20including%20crude%20humic%20substances%2C%20chicken%20litter%20biochar%2C%20and%20clinoptilolite%20zeolite%20in%20rice%20cultivation%20on%20acid%20soils%20.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79471/ https://www.agrojournal.org/25/01-12.html |
_version_ |
1701164415188992000 |