Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia
Hydrological models are reliable tools that have been extensively used for hydrological studies. However, the complexity of some of these models has been a major setback, which affects their performance. This study compared Hydrologic Engineering Corps Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) with most...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
2020
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/1/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/ http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JST%20Vol.%2028%20(3)%20Jul.%202020/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.upm.eprints.90417 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.904172021-09-10T08:54:38Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/ Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia Ismail, Habibu Kamal, Md Rowshon Lai, Sai Hin Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri Hydrological models are reliable tools that have been extensively used for hydrological studies. However, the complexity of some of these models has been a major setback, which affects their performance. This study compared Hydrologic Engineering Corps Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) with most widely applied Soil Water Assessment Tool (ArcSWAT) model and used to assess impacts of climate change on streamflow at Bernam Basin, Malaysia for 2010-2039, 2040-2069 and 2070-2099 to the baseline period (1976- 2005) using an ensemble of ten GCMs under three RCP scenarios (RCPs 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5). The models performed satisfactorily. However, HEC-HMS performed better compared to ArcSWAT with 0.74, 0.71, 4.21 and 0.37; and 0.71, 0.69, 5.32 and 0.31 for R2 , NSE, PBIAS and RSR, respectively, during the calibration and validation periods. Future periods suggest a decreasing pattern in streamflow, with a higher percentage (−5.94%) expected for the RCP 8.5 scenario in the late century (2080s) during dry season period. In the wet season, streamflow decreases in all future periods except for RCP4.5 where it is expected to increase (0.36%). Therefore, the Basin may likely experience tremendous pressure in the late century due to low streamflow, particularly in dry season months. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2020-07-16 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/1/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf Ismail, Habibu and Kamal, Md Rowshon and Lai, Sai Hin and Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri (2020) Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 28 (3). pp. 1027-1048. ISSN 0128-7680; ESSN: 2231-8526 http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JST%20Vol.%2028%20(3)%20Jul.%202020/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Hydrological models are reliable tools that have been extensively used for hydrological studies. However, the complexity of some of these models has been a major setback, which affects their performance. This study compared Hydrologic Engineering Corps Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) with most widely applied Soil Water Assessment Tool (ArcSWAT) model and used to assess impacts of climate change on streamflow at Bernam Basin, Malaysia for 2010-2039, 2040-2069 and 2070-2099 to the baseline period (1976- 2005) using an ensemble of ten GCMs under three RCP scenarios (RCPs 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5). The models performed satisfactorily. However, HEC-HMS performed better compared to ArcSWAT with 0.74, 0.71, 4.21 and 0.37; and 0.71, 0.69, 5.32 and 0.31 for R2 , NSE, PBIAS and RSR, respectively, during the calibration and validation periods. Future periods suggest a decreasing pattern in streamflow, with a higher percentage (−5.94%) expected for the RCP 8.5 scenario in the late century (2080s) during dry season period. In the wet season, streamflow decreases in all future periods except for RCP4.5 where it is expected to increase (0.36%). Therefore, the Basin may likely experience tremendous pressure in the late century due to low streamflow, particularly in dry season months. |
format |
Article |
author |
Ismail, Habibu Kamal, Md Rowshon Lai, Sai Hin Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri |
spellingShingle |
Ismail, Habibu Kamal, Md Rowshon Lai, Sai Hin Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
author_facet |
Ismail, Habibu Kamal, Md Rowshon Lai, Sai Hin Abdullah, Ahmad Fikri |
author_sort |
Ismail, Habibu |
title |
Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
title_short |
Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
title_full |
Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
title_fullStr |
Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of HEC-HMS and ArcSWAT models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at Bernam River Basin in Malaysia |
title_sort |
performance of hec-hms and arcswat models for assessing climate change impacts on streamflow at bernam river basin in malaysia |
publisher |
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/1/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90417/ http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JST%20Vol.%2028%20(3)%20Jul.%202020/15%20JST-1912-2020.pdf |
_version_ |
1712286779035353088 |