The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis

The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for analysis were collected from th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahazan Abdul Mutalib, Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali
Other Authors: Faculty of Leadership and Management
Format: Conference Paper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
Language: English
id my.usim-6000
record_format dspace
spelling my.usim-60002017-01-09T20:29:51Z The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis Mahazan Abdul Mutalib Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali Faculty of Leadership and Management Islamic leadership Servant leadership Hermeneutics Content analysis The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for analysis were collected from three major secondary sources: the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L), Servant Leadership (S-L), and General Leadership (G-L). The result of an approach based on hermeneutics and content analysis revealed that the concept of Servant Leadership (S-L) accords with Islamic Leadership (I-L) particularly in the aspect of how both of the concepts focus on the aspect ethical leadership. Moreover; based on the nineteen clusters of Islamic Leadership (I-L) designed to examine the ten characteristics of Servant Leadership (S-L) in the open and axial coding process, this research found that the ten characteristics of S-L accord with the nineteen clusters, except in five clusters: justice and equity; profit-orientation; moderation and balance; spiritual, religious, faith in God and piety; and coerciveness under certain circumstances with limitations. The differences have suggested that in general the literature of Servant Leadership (S-L) should be enriched with more ideas pertaining to other aspects of leadership, for example Islamic Leadership (I-L) besides those to do with organisational leadership, while the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L) should be enriched with more information pertaining to contemporary leadership processes and contexts. 2012-11-09T02:35:25Z 2012-11-09T02:35:25Z 2012-11-09 Conference Paper http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000 en
institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
building USIM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universit Sains Islam i Malaysia
content_source USIM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ddms.usim.edu.my/
language English
topic Islamic leadership
Servant leadership
Hermeneutics
Content analysis
spellingShingle Islamic leadership
Servant leadership
Hermeneutics
Content analysis
Mahazan Abdul Mutalib
Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
description The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for analysis were collected from three major secondary sources: the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L), Servant Leadership (S-L), and General Leadership (G-L). The result of an approach based on hermeneutics and content analysis revealed that the concept of Servant Leadership (S-L) accords with Islamic Leadership (I-L) particularly in the aspect of how both of the concepts focus on the aspect ethical leadership. Moreover; based on the nineteen clusters of Islamic Leadership (I-L) designed to examine the ten characteristics of Servant Leadership (S-L) in the open and axial coding process, this research found that the ten characteristics of S-L accord with the nineteen clusters, except in five clusters: justice and equity; profit-orientation; moderation and balance; spiritual, religious, faith in God and piety; and coerciveness under certain circumstances with limitations. The differences have suggested that in general the literature of Servant Leadership (S-L) should be enriched with more ideas pertaining to other aspects of leadership, for example Islamic Leadership (I-L) besides those to do with organisational leadership, while the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L) should be enriched with more information pertaining to contemporary leadership processes and contexts.
author2 Faculty of Leadership and Management
author_facet Faculty of Leadership and Management
Mahazan Abdul Mutalib
Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali
format Conference Paper
author Mahazan Abdul Mutalib
Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali
author_sort Mahazan Abdul Mutalib
title The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
title_short The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
title_full The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
title_sort concept of servant and islamic leadership: a comparative analysis
publishDate 2012
url http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000
_version_ 1645151777812643840