Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)

The climbing abilities of two bed bug species, Cimex lectularius L. and Cimex hemipterus (F.), were determined by evaluating their escape rates from smooth surface pitfall traps using four commercial bed bug monitors (Verifi Bed Bug Detector, ClimbUp Insect Interceptor, BlackOut Bed Bug Detector,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dae, Yun Kim, Johan, Billen, Stephen , L. Doggett, Chow, Yang Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/40285/1/Kim_et_al._2017_Differences_in_Climbing_Ability_of_Cimex_lectularius_and_Cimex_hemipterus.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/40285/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Language: English
id my.usm.eprints.40285
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.40285 http://eprints.usm.my/40285/ Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) Dae, Yun Kim Johan, Billen Stephen , L. Doggett Chow, Yang Lee QH1 Natural history (General - Including nature conservation, geographical distribution) The climbing abilities of two bed bug species, Cimex lectularius L. and Cimex hemipterus (F.), were determined by evaluating their escape rates from smooth surface pitfall traps using four commercial bed bug monitors (Verifi Bed Bug Detector, ClimbUp Insect Interceptor, BlackOut Bed Bug Detector, and SenSci Volcano Bed Bug Detector). All detectors were used in the absence of lures or attractants. Unlike C. lectularius, adult C. hemipterus were able to escape from all traps. On the other hand, no or a low number nymphs of both species escaped, depending on the evaluated traps. Examination of the vertical friction force of adults of both species revealed a higher vertical friction force in C. hemipterus than in C. lectularius. Scanning electron microscope micrograph observation on the tibial pad of adult bed bugs of C. hemipterus showed the presence of a greater number of tenent hairs on the tibial pad than on that of adult C. lectularius. No tibial pad was found on the fourth and fifth instars of both species. Near the base of the hollow tenent hairs is a glandular epithelium that is better developed in adult C. hemipterus than in adult C. lectularius. This study highlights significant morphological differences between C. lectularius and C. hemipterus, which may have implications in the monitoring and management of bed bug infestations. Oxford University Press 2017-03-15 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/40285/1/Kim_et_al._2017_Differences_in_Climbing_Ability_of_Cimex_lectularius_and_Cimex_hemipterus.pdf Dae, Yun Kim and Johan, Billen and Stephen , L. Doggett and Chow, Yang Lee (2017) Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 110 (3). pp. 1179-1186.
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic QH1 Natural history (General - Including nature conservation, geographical distribution)
spellingShingle QH1 Natural history (General - Including nature conservation, geographical distribution)
Dae, Yun Kim
Johan, Billen
Stephen , L. Doggett
Chow, Yang Lee
Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
description The climbing abilities of two bed bug species, Cimex lectularius L. and Cimex hemipterus (F.), were determined by evaluating their escape rates from smooth surface pitfall traps using four commercial bed bug monitors (Verifi Bed Bug Detector, ClimbUp Insect Interceptor, BlackOut Bed Bug Detector, and SenSci Volcano Bed Bug Detector). All detectors were used in the absence of lures or attractants. Unlike C. lectularius, adult C. hemipterus were able to escape from all traps. On the other hand, no or a low number nymphs of both species escaped, depending on the evaluated traps. Examination of the vertical friction force of adults of both species revealed a higher vertical friction force in C. hemipterus than in C. lectularius. Scanning electron microscope micrograph observation on the tibial pad of adult bed bugs of C. hemipterus showed the presence of a greater number of tenent hairs on the tibial pad than on that of adult C. lectularius. No tibial pad was found on the fourth and fifth instars of both species. Near the base of the hollow tenent hairs is a glandular epithelium that is better developed in adult C. hemipterus than in adult C. lectularius. This study highlights significant morphological differences between C. lectularius and C. hemipterus, which may have implications in the monitoring and management of bed bug infestations.
format Article
author Dae, Yun Kim
Johan, Billen
Stephen , L. Doggett
Chow, Yang Lee
author_facet Dae, Yun Kim
Johan, Billen
Stephen , L. Doggett
Chow, Yang Lee
author_sort Dae, Yun Kim
title Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
title_short Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
title_full Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
title_fullStr Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Climbing Ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae)
title_sort differences in climbing ability of cimex lectularius and cimex hemipterus (hemiptera: cimicidae)
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.usm.my/40285/1/Kim_et_al._2017_Differences_in_Climbing_Ability_of_Cimex_lectularius_and_Cimex_hemipterus.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/40285/
_version_ 1643709898706386944