Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents

It is important for a neighbourhood to provide a quality and good environment to ensure that inhabitants are able to live their lives in a satisfying way. There have been few attempts to investigate people‟s perceptions about the places they currently live, especially what makes their neighbourhood...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leby, Jasmine Lau, Hashim, Ahmad Hariza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/42190/1/JCDC_Vol_15%281%29_ART_4_%2867-91%29.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/42190/
http://web.usm.my/jcdc/vol15_1_2010/JCDC%20Vol%2015(1)%20ART%204%20(67-91).pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Language: English
id my.usm.eprints.42190
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.42190 http://eprints.usm.my/42190/ Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents Leby, Jasmine Lau Hashim, Ahmad Hariza TH1-9745 Building construction It is important for a neighbourhood to provide a quality and good environment to ensure that inhabitants are able to live their lives in a satisfying way. There have been few attempts to investigate people‟s perceptions about the places they currently live, especially what makes their neighbourhoods a good or bad place to live. Thus, this study aims (1) to identify the attributes and the dimensions that residents consider in evaluating the liveability of their neighbourhood and (2) to assess the importance of these attributes and dimensions. A literature review found that four dimensions are used in most studies to understand the liveability issues: social, physical, functional and safe. Sixteen attributes are also identified to be indicators for the four dimensions. The study was conducted in one of the neighbourhoods in the Subang Jaya Municipal Council vicinity, and data were collected using mailed questionnaires. A total of 170 questionnaires were completed and returned, which represented a 57% response rate. Results revealed that residents are most concerned about safety, while social issues are deemed to be the least important factor. Thus, efforts to promote neighbourhood liveability should be focused on ensuring the overall safety of the community by incorporating a design that creates territoriality and allows more surveillance. Neighbourhoods should be maintained to avoid incivilities to reduce the fear of crime and crime itself. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2010 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/42190/1/JCDC_Vol_15%281%29_ART_4_%2867-91%29.pdf Leby, Jasmine Lau and Hashim, Ahmad Hariza (2010) Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries , 15 (1). pp. 67-91. ISSN 1823-6499 http://web.usm.my/jcdc/vol15_1_2010/JCDC%20Vol%2015(1)%20ART%204%20(67-91).pdf
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic TH1-9745 Building construction
spellingShingle TH1-9745 Building construction
Leby, Jasmine Lau
Hashim, Ahmad Hariza
Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
description It is important for a neighbourhood to provide a quality and good environment to ensure that inhabitants are able to live their lives in a satisfying way. There have been few attempts to investigate people‟s perceptions about the places they currently live, especially what makes their neighbourhoods a good or bad place to live. Thus, this study aims (1) to identify the attributes and the dimensions that residents consider in evaluating the liveability of their neighbourhood and (2) to assess the importance of these attributes and dimensions. A literature review found that four dimensions are used in most studies to understand the liveability issues: social, physical, functional and safe. Sixteen attributes are also identified to be indicators for the four dimensions. The study was conducted in one of the neighbourhoods in the Subang Jaya Municipal Council vicinity, and data were collected using mailed questionnaires. A total of 170 questionnaires were completed and returned, which represented a 57% response rate. Results revealed that residents are most concerned about safety, while social issues are deemed to be the least important factor. Thus, efforts to promote neighbourhood liveability should be focused on ensuring the overall safety of the community by incorporating a design that creates territoriality and allows more surveillance. Neighbourhoods should be maintained to avoid incivilities to reduce the fear of crime and crime itself.
format Article
author Leby, Jasmine Lau
Hashim, Ahmad Hariza
author_facet Leby, Jasmine Lau
Hashim, Ahmad Hariza
author_sort Leby, Jasmine Lau
title Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
title_short Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
title_full Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
title_fullStr Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
title_full_unstemmed Liveability Dimensions And Attributes: Their Relative Importance In The Eyes Of Neighbourhood Residents
title_sort liveability dimensions and attributes: their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.usm.my/42190/1/JCDC_Vol_15%281%29_ART_4_%2867-91%29.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/42190/
http://web.usm.my/jcdc/vol15_1_2010/JCDC%20Vol%2015(1)%20ART%204%20(67-91).pdf
_version_ 1643710434635677696