CONWIP Based Control Of A Semiconductor End Of Line Assembly
Advancement of technology and trends in globalization has resulted in higher customer demands and expectations. Manufacturers now offer mass customization to stay competitive. In the semiconductor industry, where product mix and volume are high, production is further complicated by the different p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciencedirect
2013
|
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/10901/1/PROCEDIA_CONWIP.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/10901/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705813001975# |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Advancement of technology and trends in globalization has resulted in higher customer demands and expectations. Manufacturers
now offer mass customization to stay competitive. In the semiconductor industry, where product mix and volume are high,
production is further complicated by the different process routes and processing times for different product families. Coupled with
rapid changeovers of products, it is essential to keep the work in process (WIP) low in order to reduce the inventory level on the shop
floor. CONWIP is a production control strategy applicable in many manufacturing environment, that uses cards to control WIP level.
In this paper, discrete event simulation models for processes at the End of Line (EOL) assembly in a semiconductor manufacturing
company were developed. Experiments were conducted using these models to compare the current system with the single loop and
multi loop CONWIP control mechanisms. Performance parameters of throughput, cycle time and WIP level were compared in all
experiments. The result, firstly, shows that, generally, CONWIP production control is more effective to reduce WIP level compared
to the current system. The reduction in WIP is accompanied by corresponding improvements of cycle times. Secondly, the multiloop
system performs better than the single loop system with higher cycle time reduction. Multi loop control is also more robust and
provides a better control mechanism compared to the single loop system. |
---|