Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software

The tray dryer is the most extensively used drying system because of its simple and economic design. The drawback of this dryer is the non-uniformity in the final moisture content of the product. This research aims to predict the temperature and velocity profile in the drying chamber using computati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suhaimi, Misha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IDOSI Publications 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/1/Comparison_Between_2D_and_3D_Simulations_of_a_Tray_Dryer_System_Using_CFD_Software.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/
http://www.idosi.org/wasj/online.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Language: English
id my.utem.eprints.11297
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.112972015-05-28T04:16:41Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/ Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software Suhaimi, Misha TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The tray dryer is the most extensively used drying system because of its simple and economic design. The drawback of this dryer is the non-uniformity in the final moisture content of the product. This research aims to predict the temperature and velocity profile in the drying chamber using computational fluid dynamics simulations. Two 3D designs of drying chambers (cases 1 and 2) were studied. Both designs have the same dimensions, except for the geometry of the inlet and outlet boundary conditions. The simulation was performed in 3D, but the analysis was carried out in a 2D plane. Another 2D simulation (case 3) was carried out to compare the results with those of the 3D simulation. The design in case 2 can be represented in a 2D simulation, whereas the design in case 1 must be represented in a 3D simulation. The 3D simulation can be simplified into a 2D simulation if the geometry and boundary conditions in the 3D simulation are the same as those in the 2D simulation at any position of the plane parallel to the 2D drawing. The 2D simulation is simple and saves time in terms of design, meshing and iteration processes for achieving convergent solutions. IDOSI Publications 2014-01-28 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/1/Comparison_Between_2D_and_3D_Simulations_of_a_Tray_Dryer_System_Using_CFD_Software.pdf Suhaimi, Misha (2014) Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29 (10). pp. 1301-1309. ISSN 1818-4952 http://www.idosi.org/wasj/online.htm 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.10.1581
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Suhaimi, Misha
Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
description The tray dryer is the most extensively used drying system because of its simple and economic design. The drawback of this dryer is the non-uniformity in the final moisture content of the product. This research aims to predict the temperature and velocity profile in the drying chamber using computational fluid dynamics simulations. Two 3D designs of drying chambers (cases 1 and 2) were studied. Both designs have the same dimensions, except for the geometry of the inlet and outlet boundary conditions. The simulation was performed in 3D, but the analysis was carried out in a 2D plane. Another 2D simulation (case 3) was carried out to compare the results with those of the 3D simulation. The design in case 2 can be represented in a 2D simulation, whereas the design in case 1 must be represented in a 3D simulation. The 3D simulation can be simplified into a 2D simulation if the geometry and boundary conditions in the 3D simulation are the same as those in the 2D simulation at any position of the plane parallel to the 2D drawing. The 2D simulation is simple and saves time in terms of design, meshing and iteration processes for achieving convergent solutions.
format Article
author Suhaimi, Misha
author_facet Suhaimi, Misha
author_sort Suhaimi, Misha
title Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
title_short Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
title_full Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
title_fullStr Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between 2D and 3D Simulations of a Tray Dryer System Using CFD Software
title_sort comparison between 2d and 3d simulations of a tray dryer system using cfd software
publisher IDOSI Publications
publishDate 2014
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/1/Comparison_Between_2D_and_3D_Simulations_of_a_Tray_Dryer_System_Using_CFD_Software.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11297/
http://www.idosi.org/wasj/online.htm
_version_ 1665905458252087296