A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
2021
|
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
Language: | English |
id |
my.utem.eprints.25614 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utem.eprints.256142023-07-07T11:21:40Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/ A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system Khatib, Tamer Bujal, Noor Ropidah Sulaiman, Marizan Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The multi-objective function optimization includes power loss minimization (Ploss), Minimum bus voltage (Vbusmin), and an average voltage total harmonic distortion (THDv) are considered in this optimization problem and the IEEE 13-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution network were applied on this study. The benefits due to the optimal placement and sizing of DG include power loss reduction, minimization of total harmonic distortion, and improvement of bus voltages, especially the weakest bus in the distribution network. The impact of DG installation at the proposed location with the proposed sizing on voltage stability margin also presented. The results show the Voltage Stability Margin (VSM) for both real power (P) and reactive power (Q) at the weakest bus after DG have improvement with present of DG. Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2021-11 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF Khatib, Tamer and Bujal, Noor Ropidah and Sulaiman, Marizan and Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana and El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour (2021) A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 16 (6). pp. 2949-2966. ISSN 1975-0102 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y 10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y |
institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
building |
UTEM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
content_source |
UTEM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The multi-objective function optimization includes power loss minimization (Ploss), Minimum bus voltage (Vbusmin), and an average voltage total harmonic distortion (THDv) are considered in this optimization problem and the IEEE 13-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution network were applied on this study. The benefits due to the optimal placement and sizing of DG include power loss reduction, minimization of total harmonic distortion, and improvement of bus voltages, especially the weakest bus in the distribution network. The impact of DG installation at the proposed location with the proposed sizing on voltage stability margin also presented. The results show the Voltage Stability Margin (VSM) for both real power (P) and reactive power (Q) at the weakest bus after DG have improvement with present of DG. |
format |
Article |
author |
Khatib, Tamer Bujal, Noor Ropidah Sulaiman, Marizan Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour |
spellingShingle |
Khatib, Tamer Bujal, Noor Ropidah Sulaiman, Marizan Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
author_facet |
Khatib, Tamer Bujal, Noor Ropidah Sulaiman, Marizan Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour |
author_sort |
Khatib, Tamer |
title |
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
title_short |
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
title_full |
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
title_sort |
comparison between gsa and igsa for optimal allocation and sizing of dg and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system |
publisher |
Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y |
_version_ |
1772816022454140928 |