Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication

Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wirel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton, Zainal, Izzah Hazirah, Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi, Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty, Rihawi, Zeina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama 2024
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/
https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212
http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Language: English
id my.utem.eprints.28402
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.284022025-02-10T16:22:56Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/ Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton Zainal, Izzah Hazirah Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty Rihawi, Zeina Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wireless communication (UVC). Several parameters are simulated, including bit error rate (BER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), data rate, and received power, to compare the performance of each technology in various scenarios. Owing to its wide bandwidth, license-free frequency spectrum, and low signal attenuation at low carrier frequencies, the OWC is suitable for radio frequency applications in many situations, including indoor environments. The simulation results show that UVC outperformed OWC in terms of BER and SNR. Moreover, UVC has a higher data transmission rate of up to 1.1 Gbps, making it a suitable technology for 5G communication. Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama 2024-09 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_sa_4 http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton and Zainal, Izzah Hazirah and Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi and Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty and Rihawi, Zeina (2024) Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences (IJAAS), 13 (3). pp. 611-619. ISSN 2252-8814 https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212 http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
description Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wireless communication (UVC). Several parameters are simulated, including bit error rate (BER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), data rate, and received power, to compare the performance of each technology in various scenarios. Owing to its wide bandwidth, license-free frequency spectrum, and low signal attenuation at low carrier frequencies, the OWC is suitable for radio frequency applications in many situations, including indoor environments. The simulation results show that UVC outperformed OWC in terms of BER and SNR. Moreover, UVC has a higher data transmission rate of up to 1.1 Gbps, making it a suitable technology for 5G communication.
format Article
author Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton
Zainal, Izzah Hazirah
Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi
Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty
Rihawi, Zeina
spellingShingle Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton
Zainal, Izzah Hazirah
Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi
Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty
Rihawi, Zeina
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
author_facet Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton
Zainal, Izzah Hazirah
Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi
Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty
Rihawi, Zeina
author_sort Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton
title Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
title_short Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
title_full Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
title_fullStr Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
title_full_unstemmed Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
title_sort comparing 5g indoor wireless technologies: optical vs ultraviolet communication
publisher Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/
https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212
http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619
_version_ 1825166530586869760