Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication
Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wirel...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama
2024
|
Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/ https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212 http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
Language: | English |
id |
my.utem.eprints.28402 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utem.eprints.284022025-02-10T16:22:56Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/ Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton Zainal, Izzah Hazirah Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty Rihawi, Zeina Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wireless communication (UVC). Several parameters are simulated, including bit error rate (BER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), data rate, and received power, to compare the performance of each technology in various scenarios. Owing to its wide bandwidth, license-free frequency spectrum, and low signal attenuation at low carrier frequencies, the OWC is suitable for radio frequency applications in many situations, including indoor environments. The simulation results show that UVC outperformed OWC in terms of BER and SNR. Moreover, UVC has a higher data transmission rate of up to 1.1 Gbps, making it a suitable technology for 5G communication. Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama 2024-09 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_sa_4 http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton and Zainal, Izzah Hazirah and Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi and Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty and Rihawi, Zeina (2024) Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences (IJAAS), 13 (3). pp. 611-619. ISSN 2252-8814 https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212 http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619 |
institution |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
building |
UTEM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka |
content_source |
UTEM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Wireless communication technologies have become one of the biggest technologies that are considered suitable for radio frequency in various types of applications, including indoor applications. This study investigates the differences between optical wireless communication (OWC) and ultraviolet wireless communication (UVC). Several parameters are simulated, including bit error rate (BER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), data rate, and received power, to compare the performance of each technology in various scenarios. Owing to its wide bandwidth, license-free frequency spectrum, and low signal attenuation at low carrier frequencies, the OWC is suitable for radio frequency applications in many situations, including indoor environments. The simulation results show that UVC outperformed OWC in terms of BER and SNR. Moreover, UVC has a higher data transmission rate of up to 1.1
Gbps, making it a suitable technology for 5G communication. |
format |
Article |
author |
Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton Zainal, Izzah Hazirah Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty Rihawi, Zeina |
spellingShingle |
Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton Zainal, Izzah Hazirah Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty Rihawi, Zeina Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs ultraviolet communication |
author_facet |
Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton Zainal, Izzah Hazirah Mohd Yusof, Haziezol Helmi Hassan, Nurmala Irdawaty Rihawi, Zeina |
author_sort |
Abdul Mutalip, Zaiton |
title |
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
title_short |
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
title_full |
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
title_fullStr |
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing 5G indoor wireless technologies: Optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
title_sort |
comparing 5g indoor wireless technologies: optical vs
ultraviolet communication |
publisher |
Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/2/01104121220241634441366.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/28402/ https://ijaas.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/21212 http://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i3.pp611-619 |
_version_ |
1825166530586869760 |