Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0

Indonesia has low Industry 4.0 (I4.0) readiness in ASEAN and has the INDI 4.0 Instrument (Indonesia Industry 4.0 Readiness Index), which is less comprehensive and accurate. An Initial survey confirmed that only 56.86% of respondents agreed that INDI 4.0 accurately measures readiness in the manufactu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/1/J17494_f42773a620033f824262a8414f06075e.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/
http://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2024.1.013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uthm.eprints.10999
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.109992024-05-20T01:37:24Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/ Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0 Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan T Technology (General) Indonesia has low Industry 4.0 (I4.0) readiness in ASEAN and has the INDI 4.0 Instrument (Indonesia Industry 4.0 Readiness Index), which is less comprehensive and accurate. An Initial survey confirmed that only 56.86% of respondents agreed that INDI 4.0 accurately measures readiness in the manufacturing industry. Unlike primary I4.0 indices, INDI 4.0 lacks comprehensive Industry 4.0 dimensions and characteristics, as many literature and other indices cover. This study aims to identify weaknesses and strengths of major I4.0 indices by comparing them to enhance INDI 4.0. This paper identified gaps in existing major I4.0 indices by scoping review method. However, each index contributes to increasing practicality, fulfilling latent needs, and expanding complementary perspectives in measuring readiness and adoption of I4.0 based on studies, viewpoints, uniqueness, and views of each. This study offered a more comprehensive perspective, especially from developing countries like Indonesia, with industries struggling to adopt I4.0 to fill loopholes in existing major indices that are generally from developed countries, so most companies in their study have advanced or implemented I4.0 and are too focused and too oriented on technology. The findings from this paper are expected to contribute to industry, practitioners, and academicians in increasing accuracy when measuring readiness toward adopting I4.0. 2024 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/1/J17494_f42773a620033f824262a8414f06075e.pdf Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah and Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan (2024) Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0. SINERGI, 28 (1). pp. 129-140. http://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2024.1.013
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah
Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan
Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
description Indonesia has low Industry 4.0 (I4.0) readiness in ASEAN and has the INDI 4.0 Instrument (Indonesia Industry 4.0 Readiness Index), which is less comprehensive and accurate. An Initial survey confirmed that only 56.86% of respondents agreed that INDI 4.0 accurately measures readiness in the manufacturing industry. Unlike primary I4.0 indices, INDI 4.0 lacks comprehensive Industry 4.0 dimensions and characteristics, as many literature and other indices cover. This study aims to identify weaknesses and strengths of major I4.0 indices by comparing them to enhance INDI 4.0. This paper identified gaps in existing major I4.0 indices by scoping review method. However, each index contributes to increasing practicality, fulfilling latent needs, and expanding complementary perspectives in measuring readiness and adoption of I4.0 based on studies, viewpoints, uniqueness, and views of each. This study offered a more comprehensive perspective, especially from developing countries like Indonesia, with industries struggling to adopt I4.0 to fill loopholes in existing major indices that are generally from developed countries, so most companies in their study have advanced or implemented I4.0 and are too focused and too oriented on technology. The findings from this paper are expected to contribute to industry, practitioners, and academicians in increasing accuracy when measuring readiness toward adopting I4.0.
format Article
author Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah
Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan
author_facet Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah
Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan
author_sort Hasbullah Hasbullah, Hasbullah Hasbullah
title Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
title_short Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
title_full Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
title_fullStr Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
title_full_unstemmed Identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing I4.0 Readiness Indices to enhance INDI 4.0
title_sort identifying weaknesses and strengths of existing i4.0 readiness indices to enhance indi 4.0
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/1/J17494_f42773a620033f824262a8414f06075e.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/10999/
http://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2024.1.013
_version_ 1800094637814185984