Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete
The theory of critical distances (TCD) represents a new area of research on fatigue damage in concrete that is primarily used to characterise fatigue and fracture behaviours. Although TCD is accurate, it appears inconsistent when considering the water–cement ratio of concrete. Such inconsistency is...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102718/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00887-w |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
id |
my.utm.102718 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.1027182023-09-18T04:17:58Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102718/ Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan Kueh, Ahmad Beng Hong Tamin, Mohd. Nasir Kim, Jay Jang Ho Ab. Kadir, Mariyana Aida Yahaya, Nordin Md. Noor, Norhazilan TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The theory of critical distances (TCD) represents a new area of research on fatigue damage in concrete that is primarily used to characterise fatigue and fracture behaviours. Although TCD is accurate, it appears inconsistent when considering the water–cement ratio of concrete. Such inconsistency is related to the tendency to overlook the effects of the water–cement ratio owing to the small differences observed in tensile strength. The study’s main objective is to explore how sensitive fatigue characteristics in concrete are to different water–cement ratios. This research is important because information on concrete’s fatigue limits—especially regarding comparisons between different concrete mixes—is scarce. There is a lack of standard procedures for testing the fatigue and fracture behaviour of plain concrete, thus being inconsistent and slow. Thus, the current study has utilised the TCD concept to assess fatigue. However, TCD seems to be susceptible to changes in the water–cement ratio of concrete. Water–cement ratios of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 increased concrete’s fatigue limit to 2.883, 3.022, and 3.903 MPa, respectively. These increases were confirmed to be significant. Thus, this research will improve the current understanding of TCD’s value in fatigue analyses of concrete structures. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2022 Article PeerReviewed Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan and Kueh, Ahmad Beng Hong and Tamin, Mohd. Nasir and Kim, Jay Jang Ho and Ab. Kadir, Mariyana Aida and Yahaya, Nordin and Md. Noor, Norhazilan (2022) Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, 46 (6). pp. 4281-4290. ISSN 2228-6160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00887-w DOI: 10.1007/s40996-022-00887-w |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
spellingShingle |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan Kueh, Ahmad Beng Hong Tamin, Mohd. Nasir Kim, Jay Jang Ho Ab. Kadir, Mariyana Aida Yahaya, Nordin Md. Noor, Norhazilan Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
description |
The theory of critical distances (TCD) represents a new area of research on fatigue damage in concrete that is primarily used to characterise fatigue and fracture behaviours. Although TCD is accurate, it appears inconsistent when considering the water–cement ratio of concrete. Such inconsistency is related to the tendency to overlook the effects of the water–cement ratio owing to the small differences observed in tensile strength. The study’s main objective is to explore how sensitive fatigue characteristics in concrete are to different water–cement ratios. This research is important because information on concrete’s fatigue limits—especially regarding comparisons between different concrete mixes—is scarce. There is a lack of standard procedures for testing the fatigue and fracture behaviour of plain concrete, thus being inconsistent and slow. Thus, the current study has utilised the TCD concept to assess fatigue. However, TCD seems to be susceptible to changes in the water–cement ratio of concrete. Water–cement ratios of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 increased concrete’s fatigue limit to 2.883, 3.022, and 3.903 MPa, respectively. These increases were confirmed to be significant. Thus, this research will improve the current understanding of TCD’s value in fatigue analyses of concrete structures. |
format |
Article |
author |
Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan Kueh, Ahmad Beng Hong Tamin, Mohd. Nasir Kim, Jay Jang Ho Ab. Kadir, Mariyana Aida Yahaya, Nordin Md. Noor, Norhazilan |
author_facet |
Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan Kueh, Ahmad Beng Hong Tamin, Mohd. Nasir Kim, Jay Jang Ho Ab. Kadir, Mariyana Aida Yahaya, Nordin Md. Noor, Norhazilan |
author_sort |
Ahmad Shah, Mohamad Shazwan |
title |
Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
title_short |
Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
title_full |
Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
title_fullStr |
Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
title_full_unstemmed |
Water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
title_sort |
water-cement ratio on high-cycle fatigue in the theory of critical distances of plain concrete |
publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102718/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00887-w |
_version_ |
1778160771252879360 |