The arbitrator's response as a guarantee for arbitrators in light of UAE law: a comparative study.

The aim of this research is to determine the objective and temporal scope of the arbitrator's response, and to clarify the controls and procedures for the arbitrator's response according to the UAE Arbitration Law No. (6) of 2018 compared to the Egyptian Arbitration Law No. (27) of 1994 an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Matrooshi, Rashid Obaid, Rosman, Arieff Salleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/105265/1/ArieffSallehRosman2023_TheArbitratorsResponseasaGuaranteeforArbitrators.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/105265/
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i10/18971
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
Description
Summary:The aim of this research is to determine the objective and temporal scope of the arbitrator's response, and to clarify the controls and procedures for the arbitrator's response according to the UAE Arbitration Law No. (6) of 2018 compared to the Egyptian Arbitration Law No. (27) of 1994 and its amendments. The research relied on the analytical descriptive approach and the comparative approach, and through these Approaches The legal texts related to the arbitrator’s response will be analyzed as a guarantee of the arbitrators’ guarantees, and the research reached several results, the most important of which is that both the Emirati legislator and the Egyptian legislator permitted the arbitrator to step down voluntarily in the event that a request for a response was submitted against him, and both of them restricted that procedure to a deadline of (15) fifteen days The research recommended that the Egyptian legislator take the idea of the violation of one of the convention or legal conditions in the arbitrator as one of the reasons for the response; As this guarantees the continued impartiality and independence of the arbitrator.