Modeling significant wave heights for multiple time horizons using metaheuristic regression methods

The study examines the applicability of six metaheuristic regression techniques—M5 model tree (M5RT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), principal component regression (PCR), random forest (RF), partial least square regression (PLSR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR)—for predicting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ikram, Rana Muhammad Adnan, Cao, Xinyi, Parmar, Kulwinder Singh, Kisi, Ozgur, Shahid, Shamsuddin, Zounemat Kermani, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/105675/1/ShamsuddinShahid2023_ModelingSignificantWaveHeights.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/105675/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math11143141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
Description
Summary:The study examines the applicability of six metaheuristic regression techniques—M5 model tree (M5RT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), principal component regression (PCR), random forest (RF), partial least square regression (PLSR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR)—for predicting short-term significant wave heights from one hour to one day ahead. Hourly data from two stations, Townsville and Brisbane Buoys, Queensland, Australia, and historical values were used as model inputs for the predictions. The methods were assessed based on root mean square error, mean absolute error, determination coefficient and new graphical inspection methods (e.g., Taylor and violin charts). On the basis of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) statistics, it was observed that GPR provided the best accuracy in predicting short-term single-time-step and multi-time-step significant wave heights. On the basis of mean RMSE, GPR improved the accuracy of M5RT, MARS, PCR, RF and PLSR by 16.63, 8.03, 10.34, 3.25 and 7.78% (first station) and by 14.04, 8.35, 13.34, 3.87 and 8.30% (second station) for the test stage.