Modeling significant wave heights for multiple time horizons using metaheuristic regression methods
The study examines the applicability of six metaheuristic regression techniques—M5 model tree (M5RT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), principal component regression (PCR), random forest (RF), partial least square regression (PLSR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR)—for predicting...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/105675/1/ShamsuddinShahid2023_ModelingSignificantWaveHeights.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/105675/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math11143141 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The study examines the applicability of six metaheuristic regression techniques—M5 model tree (M5RT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), principal component regression (PCR), random forest (RF), partial least square regression (PLSR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR)—for predicting short-term significant wave heights from one hour to one day ahead. Hourly data from two stations, Townsville and Brisbane Buoys, Queensland, Australia, and historical values were used as model inputs for the predictions. The methods were assessed based on root mean square error, mean absolute error, determination coefficient and new graphical inspection methods (e.g., Taylor and violin charts). On the basis of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) statistics, it was observed that GPR provided the best accuracy in predicting short-term single-time-step and multi-time-step significant wave heights. On the basis of mean RMSE, GPR improved the accuracy of M5RT, MARS, PCR, RF and PLSR by 16.63, 8.03, 10.34, 3.25 and 7.78% (first station) and by 14.04, 8.35, 13.34, 3.87 and 8.30% (second station) for the test stage. |
---|