Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database

This paper compares our two segmentation techniques for cursive handwriting recognition. In the first approach, following heuristic segmentation a set of rules is applied lo come out with real segmentation points. Whereas, in the second, prospective segmentation points of heuristic segmenter are val...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rehman, Amjad, Kurniawan, Fajri, Mohamad, Dzulkifli
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/15260/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.15260
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.152602020-08-30T08:46:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/15260/ Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database Rehman, Amjad Kurniawan, Fajri Mohamad, Dzulkifli QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science This paper compares our two segmentation techniques for cursive handwriting recognition. In the first approach, following heuristic segmentation a set of rules is applied lo come out with real segmentation points. Whereas, in the second, prospective segmentation points of heuristic segmenter are validated by a trained ANN and therefore invalid segmentation points are rejected. For character classification, hybrid features are extracted of ultimate segmented characters by each approach and are fed to ANN trained with segmented character recognition. Techniques are tested and compared on IAM benchmark database with consistent. 2009 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed Rehman, Amjad and Kurniawan, Fajri and Mohamad, Dzulkifli (2009) Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database. In: International Conference on Information Science, Technology and Applications (ISTA 2009), 2009, Marina Hotel, Kuwait.
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Rehman, Amjad
Kurniawan, Fajri
Mohamad, Dzulkifli
Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
description This paper compares our two segmentation techniques for cursive handwriting recognition. In the first approach, following heuristic segmentation a set of rules is applied lo come out with real segmentation points. Whereas, in the second, prospective segmentation points of heuristic segmenter are validated by a trained ANN and therefore invalid segmentation points are rejected. For character classification, hybrid features are extracted of ultimate segmented characters by each approach and are fed to ANN trained with segmented character recognition. Techniques are tested and compared on IAM benchmark database with consistent.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Rehman, Amjad
Kurniawan, Fajri
Mohamad, Dzulkifli
author_facet Rehman, Amjad
Kurniawan, Fajri
Mohamad, Dzulkifli
author_sort Rehman, Amjad
title Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
title_short Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
title_full Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
title_fullStr Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
title_full_unstemmed Heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
title_sort heuristic vs neuro heuristic script segmentation and recognition: a performance comparison on benchmark database
publishDate 2009
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/15260/
_version_ 1677781061228036096