Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image

This research is focused on the comparison of measurements between analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image. This study is designed to determine the best measurement method between manually tracing and using computer software. Two (2) types of data from the same patient were used in this re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. Lani, Ruzaini, Setan, Halim, Chong, Albert K., Majid, Zulkepli
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/1/RuzainiMdLani2006_Cephalometricmeasurementscomparisonbetweenanalog.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/
http://www.voronoi.com/isg2013/Home.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.1835
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.18352017-08-23T00:19:07Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/ Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image Md. Lani, Ruzaini Setan, Halim Chong, Albert K. Majid, Zulkepli TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This research is focused on the comparison of measurements between analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image. This study is designed to determine the best measurement method between manually tracing and using computer software. Two (2) types of data from the same patient were used in this research. The data is analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image (obtained from scanned x-ray film). A total of ten landmarks were used for comparison. All landmarks on the film and digital cephalometric image were traced using manual method (via tracing paper) and computerized method (via Rhinoceros 2.0 software) respectively. The landmarks were identified five times for each method to ensure the precision of the landmark identification. The results of landmark identification for both manual and computerize methods were compared by measurement of angle SNA, SNB, ANB and MMPA, and linear distance between Po-Or, PNS-ANS and Go-Me. This comparison gives the value of mean and standard deviation to show the best measurement method between manual and computerized approaches. 2006-09 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/1/RuzainiMdLani2006_Cephalometricmeasurementscomparisonbetweenanalog.pdf Md. Lani, Ruzaini and Setan, Halim and Chong, Albert K. and Majid, Zulkepli (2006) Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image. In: International Symposium & Exhibition on Geoinformation 2006 (ISG2006), 19-21 Sept 2006, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. http://www.voronoi.com/isg2013/Home.html
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Md. Lani, Ruzaini
Setan, Halim
Chong, Albert K.
Majid, Zulkepli
Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
description This research is focused on the comparison of measurements between analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image. This study is designed to determine the best measurement method between manually tracing and using computer software. Two (2) types of data from the same patient were used in this research. The data is analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image (obtained from scanned x-ray film). A total of ten landmarks were used for comparison. All landmarks on the film and digital cephalometric image were traced using manual method (via tracing paper) and computerized method (via Rhinoceros 2.0 software) respectively. The landmarks were identified five times for each method to ensure the precision of the landmark identification. The results of landmark identification for both manual and computerize methods were compared by measurement of angle SNA, SNB, ANB and MMPA, and linear distance between Po-Or, PNS-ANS and Go-Me. This comparison gives the value of mean and standard deviation to show the best measurement method between manual and computerized approaches.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Md. Lani, Ruzaini
Setan, Halim
Chong, Albert K.
Majid, Zulkepli
author_facet Md. Lani, Ruzaini
Setan, Halim
Chong, Albert K.
Majid, Zulkepli
author_sort Md. Lani, Ruzaini
title Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
title_short Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
title_full Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
title_fullStr Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog X-Ray film and digital cephalometric image
title_sort cephalometric measurements: comparison between analog x-ray film and digital cephalometric image
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/1/RuzainiMdLani2006_Cephalometricmeasurementscomparisonbetweenanalog.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/1835/
http://www.voronoi.com/isg2013/Home.html
_version_ 1643643428846698496