Commercialization and its discontents : companies perspectives
Since the late 1990s the government of Malaysia has increased emphasis on its Intensification of Research in Priority Areas (IRPA) program, focusing sc ientific research in universities and government research institutes (GRIs) on activities most likely...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book Section |
Published: |
Penerbit UTM
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/18903/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
Summary: | Since the late 1990s the government of
Malaysia has increased emphasis on its
Intensification of Research in Priority Areas
(IRPA) program, focusing sc
ientific research in
universities and government research institutes
(GRIs) on activities most likely to enhance
national economic performance.
The IRPA’s main purpose is
to fund commercially viable
research for the benefit of business. However,
its 2001 mid-term review showed its rates and
volumes of commercialization and technology
transfer (CTT) to be inadequate.
This study aimed to explain the perceived low rate of adoption and commercialization of
scientific knowledge in manufacturing in Mala
ysia by exploring the actions of companies,
universities and GRIs. Two main mo
dels of technical change, the
Technik
and the STH ones,
were used.
Fieldwork was carried out in
Malaysia. Purposive sampli
ng led to selection of 60
interviewees: 23 managers and professionals from companies, 17 scientists, eight
Technology Transfer Office offi
cers, six senior research ad
ministrators, three venture
capitalists, two journalists and a politic
ian. The interviews were open-ended.
It was seen that research fi
ndings were not always relevant
to company interests, and
companies often preferred thei
r own or adopted, sometimes re
verse-engineered, technology.
Government CTT funds did not help much in
with design, prototypes and pilot plants.
Inadequate communication and lack of trust influenced the low
uptake of research findings.
The commercial relevance of much scientific
research was questioned. More government
support for company risk-taking appeared to be
needed. Differences in attitude and poor
understanding of policies and principles tend
ed to contribute to low uptake. Managers,
professional, scientists, Technol
ogy Transfer Officers, senior re
search administrators, venture
capitalists needed more flexib
ility, knowledge and sk
ills to respond to profit-driven research
findings. A specifically Malaysian
approach to CTT was advocated. |
---|