Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method

This aims of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in wall plastering by using new development of the ergonomic risk assessment tool which called Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA). Home building industry in three workplaces were randomly selected as a fiel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abd. Rahman, M. N., Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi, Mohd. Rohani, Jafri
Format: Book Section
Published: Newswood Limited 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29261/
http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2011/IMECS2011_pp1302-1304.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.29261
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.292612017-07-27T02:38:12Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29261/ Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method Abd. Rahman, M. N. Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi Mohd. Rohani, Jafri TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery This aims of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in wall plastering by using new development of the ergonomic risk assessment tool which called Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA). Home building industry in three workplaces were randomly selected as a field study in this research where out of 43 workers in the wall plastering job were randomly selected as a subjects. During the site visit of the three workplaces, observation of the tasks were carried out by using WERA assessment. A structured interview with self-report charts (Body Discomfort Chart) were given to all subjects for each tasks. An analysis of WERA assessment, the wrist score for WERA body part was >4 in 86% of workers, while wrist pain or discomfort was reported by 86%, yielding a significant association between WERA body part score and self-reported pain (? 2=16.12; p =0.000). The WERA body part score for the shoulder regions during wall plastering job yielded a score >4 in 93% and caused shoulder pain or discomfort in 91%, the association being significant (2 =12.58; p =0.000). The back regions for WERA body part score was >4 in 91% of workers, with 98% reporting pain or discomfort in the back regions, with a significant association (2 =9.98; p =0.002). The result shows that statistically significant for the wrist, shoulder and back regions of the individual WERA body part scores to the development of pain or discomfort. It shows that the WERA assessment provided a good indication of work related musculoskeletal disorders which might be reported as pain, ache or discomfort in the relevant body region. Newswood Limited 2011 Book Section PeerReviewed Abd. Rahman, M. N. and Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi and Mohd. Rohani, Jafri (2011) Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method. In: IMECS 2011 - International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2011. Newswood Limited, Hong Kong, pp. 1302-1304. ISBN 978-988192512-1 http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2011/IMECS2011_pp1302-1304.pdf
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Abd. Rahman, M. N.
Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi
Mohd. Rohani, Jafri
Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
description This aims of this study was to investigate the physical risk factor among the workers in wall plastering by using new development of the ergonomic risk assessment tool which called Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA). Home building industry in three workplaces were randomly selected as a field study in this research where out of 43 workers in the wall plastering job were randomly selected as a subjects. During the site visit of the three workplaces, observation of the tasks were carried out by using WERA assessment. A structured interview with self-report charts (Body Discomfort Chart) were given to all subjects for each tasks. An analysis of WERA assessment, the wrist score for WERA body part was >4 in 86% of workers, while wrist pain or discomfort was reported by 86%, yielding a significant association between WERA body part score and self-reported pain (? 2=16.12; p =0.000). The WERA body part score for the shoulder regions during wall plastering job yielded a score >4 in 93% and caused shoulder pain or discomfort in 91%, the association being significant (2 =12.58; p =0.000). The back regions for WERA body part score was >4 in 91% of workers, with 98% reporting pain or discomfort in the back regions, with a significant association (2 =9.98; p =0.002). The result shows that statistically significant for the wrist, shoulder and back regions of the individual WERA body part scores to the development of pain or discomfort. It shows that the WERA assessment provided a good indication of work related musculoskeletal disorders which might be reported as pain, ache or discomfort in the relevant body region.
format Book Section
author Abd. Rahman, M. N.
Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi
Mohd. Rohani, Jafri
author_facet Abd. Rahman, M. N.
Abdul Rani, Mat Rebi
Mohd. Rohani, Jafri
author_sort Abd. Rahman, M. N.
title Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
title_short Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
title_full Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
title_fullStr Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using WERA method
title_sort investigation of the physical risk factor in wall plastering job using wera method
publisher Newswood Limited
publishDate 2011
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/29261/
http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2011/IMECS2011_pp1302-1304.pdf
_version_ 1643648261346557952