Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification
Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity fun...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
ICIC Express Letters Office
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/ https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
id |
my.utm.30484 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.304842022-01-31T08:41:47Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/ Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification Arfa, Reza Yusof, Rubiyah Awang, Suryanti TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity function assigns a matching score to a new given face image and its claimed identity, by measuring the distance between the face image and its stored template. In this work new data are first projected into both Eigenspace and Fisher space and matching-score is obtained for each space separately. The information from these two score is combined together with three different fusion rules, i.e., sum, max, and mean rule. Two different face databases, ORL and YALE, are used to evaluate the verification accuracy based on Equal Error Rate (EER). The EER for ORL database by using fusion approach is 7.12%-7.22% compared with the PCA of 7.6% and the LDA of 7.87%. The same experiment for Yale database shows by fusing the classifiers the error is 14.22% to 15.20% while by only using PCA the error is 15.27% and the error for LDA is 15.5%. Thus, fusing Eigenface and Fisherface system outperforms using them individually. ICIC Express Letters Office 2012-04 Article PeerReviewed Arfa, Reza and Yusof, Rubiyah and Awang, Suryanti (2012) Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification. ICIC Express Letters, 6 (4). pp. 857-862. ISSN 1881-803X https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering |
spellingShingle |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Arfa, Reza Yusof, Rubiyah Awang, Suryanti Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
description |
Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are two well-known methods that are used for face verification and recognition systems. Both of these methods perform dimensionality reduction. In similarity based face verification approach, a function known as similarity function assigns a matching score to a new given face image and its claimed identity, by measuring the distance between the face image and its stored template. In this work new data are first projected into both Eigenspace and Fisher space and matching-score is obtained for each space separately. The information from these two score is combined together with three different fusion rules, i.e., sum, max, and mean rule. Two different face databases, ORL and YALE, are used to evaluate the verification accuracy based on Equal Error Rate (EER). The EER for ORL database by using fusion approach is 7.12%-7.22% compared with the PCA of 7.6% and the LDA of 7.87%. The same experiment for Yale database shows by fusing the classifiers the error is 14.22% to 15.20% while by only using PCA the error is 15.27% and the error for LDA is 15.5%. Thus, fusing Eigenface and Fisherface system outperforms using them individually. |
format |
Article |
author |
Arfa, Reza Yusof, Rubiyah Awang, Suryanti |
author_facet |
Arfa, Reza Yusof, Rubiyah Awang, Suryanti |
author_sort |
Arfa, Reza |
title |
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
title_short |
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
title_full |
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
title_fullStr |
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
title_sort |
fusion of eigenface and fisherface for face verification |
publisher |
ICIC Express Letters Office |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/30484/ https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84857956597&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1 |
_version_ |
1724073268070055936 |