Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance

Many developing countries have been strengthening subnational government through decentralisation policies (Shah 2004). The supporting argument is based on the increased efficiency and welfare gains that come from moving governance closer to the people (Bahl 2009). Fiscal decentralisation can increa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franzsen, R. C. D., Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain, Kamarudin, Norhaya, McCluskey, William J.
Format: Article
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/41033/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.41033
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.410332017-08-27T01:40:25Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/41033/ Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance Franzsen, R. C. D. Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain Kamarudin, Norhaya McCluskey, William J. HD1394-1394.5 Real estate management Many developing countries have been strengthening subnational government through decentralisation policies (Shah 2004). The supporting argument is based on the increased efficiency and welfare gains that come from moving governance closer to the people (Bahl 2009). Fiscal decentralisation can increase revenue mobilisation because it involves subnational government more directly in taxation, and, in many respects, a lower tier of government can reach wealth-based taxes in ways that central government cannot. The broadening of the local tax base, particularly with property taxes, gives subnational government a potentially lucrative revenue source (Cornia 2013; Kitchen 2013; Walters 2013). In terms of revenue mobilisation, the tax bases that are efficient and simple to administer at a subnational level tend to be few (Bird and Slack 2008; Mikesell 2013). Non-tax revenues (including user charges, licences, rents, and fees) tend to be limited in scope and revenuegenerating capacity. Local tax bases, according to Bird and Slack (2003), are narrow due to the possibility of tax exportation, externalities in the provision of public goods and services, factor mobility, and economies of scale. Broad tax bases, such as personal income tax, corporate income tax, and value-added tax (VAT), are generally best managed at higher levels of government. As a result, if subnational governments are to be important providers of public goods and services, it is necessary for higher level jurisdictions to share part of their revenues with subnational governments through transfers and grants to bridge the gap between spending and revenues mobilised locally (Bahl and Cyan 2010). 2013 Article PeerReviewed Franzsen, R. C. D. and Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain and Kamarudin, Norhaya and McCluskey, William J. (2013) Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance. Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, n/f (n/f). n/f. ISSN 1357-1419
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic HD1394-1394.5 Real estate management
spellingShingle HD1394-1394.5 Real estate management
Franzsen, R. C. D.
Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain
Kamarudin, Norhaya
McCluskey, William J.
Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
description Many developing countries have been strengthening subnational government through decentralisation policies (Shah 2004). The supporting argument is based on the increased efficiency and welfare gains that come from moving governance closer to the people (Bahl 2009). Fiscal decentralisation can increase revenue mobilisation because it involves subnational government more directly in taxation, and, in many respects, a lower tier of government can reach wealth-based taxes in ways that central government cannot. The broadening of the local tax base, particularly with property taxes, gives subnational government a potentially lucrative revenue source (Cornia 2013; Kitchen 2013; Walters 2013). In terms of revenue mobilisation, the tax bases that are efficient and simple to administer at a subnational level tend to be few (Bird and Slack 2008; Mikesell 2013). Non-tax revenues (including user charges, licences, rents, and fees) tend to be limited in scope and revenuegenerating capacity. Local tax bases, according to Bird and Slack (2003), are narrow due to the possibility of tax exportation, externalities in the provision of public goods and services, factor mobility, and economies of scale. Broad tax bases, such as personal income tax, corporate income tax, and value-added tax (VAT), are generally best managed at higher levels of government. As a result, if subnational governments are to be important providers of public goods and services, it is necessary for higher level jurisdictions to share part of their revenues with subnational governments through transfers and grants to bridge the gap between spending and revenues mobilised locally (Bahl and Cyan 2010).
format Article
author Franzsen, R. C. D.
Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain
Kamarudin, Norhaya
McCluskey, William J.
author_facet Franzsen, R. C. D.
Daud, Dzurllkanian @ Zulkarnain
Kamarudin, Norhaya
McCluskey, William J.
author_sort Franzsen, R. C. D.
title Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
title_short Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
title_full Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
title_fullStr Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
title_full_unstemmed Property tax in Malaysia and South Africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
title_sort property tax in malaysia and south africa: a question of assessment capacity and quality assurance
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/41033/
_version_ 1643650627016851456