A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography

The image reconstruction process for CCD–based optical tomography with four projections is discussed in this paper. The CCD linear image sensor used in the study is a Sony ILX551A which has 2048 pixels with a pixel size of 14-microns. The pixel arrangement used in the system is a combination of octa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Idroas, Mariani, Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria, Ibrahim, M. Nasir, Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan, M. Najib, Suhaila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/1/MarianiIdroas2011_AComparisonBetweenLinearBackprojection.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.44680
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.446802017-11-01T04:17:17Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/ A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography Idroas, Mariani Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria Ibrahim, M. Nasir Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan M. Najib, Suhaila QC Physics The image reconstruction process for CCD–based optical tomography with four projections is discussed in this paper. The CCD linear image sensor used in the study is a Sony ILX551A which has 2048 pixels with a pixel size of 14-microns. The pixel arrangement used in the system is a combination of octagonal and square pixels to ensure that light passes through the same number of pixel rows on all four projections. Two image reconstruction methods are discussed and compared in the paper – the transpose method and the layergram method. The transpose method involves the multiplication and inversion of matrices while the layergram method is simply the addition of the values of attenuation coefficients. The layergram method was found to produce better images than the transpose method, qualitatively and quantitatively (values of a). However, the transpose method requires a shorter processing time than the layergram method. Penerbit UTM Press 2011 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/1/MarianiIdroas2011_AComparisonBetweenLinearBackprojection.pdf Idroas, Mariani and Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria and Ibrahim, M. Nasir and Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan and M. Najib, Suhaila (2011) A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 55 (2). pp. 23-31. ISSN 0127-9696
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QC Physics
spellingShingle QC Physics
Idroas, Mariani
Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria
Ibrahim, M. Nasir
Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan
M. Najib, Suhaila
A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
description The image reconstruction process for CCD–based optical tomography with four projections is discussed in this paper. The CCD linear image sensor used in the study is a Sony ILX551A which has 2048 pixels with a pixel size of 14-microns. The pixel arrangement used in the system is a combination of octagonal and square pixels to ensure that light passes through the same number of pixel rows on all four projections. Two image reconstruction methods are discussed and compared in the paper – the transpose method and the layergram method. The transpose method involves the multiplication and inversion of matrices while the layergram method is simply the addition of the values of attenuation coefficients. The layergram method was found to produce better images than the transpose method, qualitatively and quantitatively (values of a). However, the transpose method requires a shorter processing time than the layergram method.
format Article
author Idroas, Mariani
Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria
Ibrahim, M. Nasir
Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan
M. Najib, Suhaila
author_facet Idroas, Mariani
Sapi’ee, Nora Faaria
Ibrahim, M. Nasir
Md. Zin, A. Ridhwan
M. Najib, Suhaila
author_sort Idroas, Mariani
title A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
title_short A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
title_full A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
title_fullStr A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
title_sort comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (ccd) based optical tomography
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2011
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/1/MarianiIdroas2011_AComparisonBetweenLinearBackprojection.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/44680/
_version_ 1643651511826251776