Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods

The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the paveme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aziz Memon, Naeem
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.4984
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.49842018-02-28T06:51:00Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/ Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods Aziz Memon, Naeem HE Transportation and Communications TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the pavement thickness due to the traffic loads, steps must also be taken to extend the pavement life by using different compaction methods such as gyratory laboratory compaction method to have durable mix and better simulate field conditions. However, the main shortcoming of gyratory compaction method is that the gyratory compactor is very costly as seven times more than that of the available Marshall hammer.To overcome that shortcoming, studies have been done to compare both laboratory compaction methods but more are needed to verify different findings according to different conditions and climate. In this research four asphalt concrete mixes asphalt wearing course(ACW)10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 were designed using Marshall mix design to evaluate HMA properties such as density and air voids. Based on the Marshall results, specimens were fabricated to obtain the required number of gyrations that could produce same results in terms of density. Using the equivalent number of gyrations samples were designed using superpave to obtain the optimum bitumen content (OBC). The results indicate that at 75 blows Marshall, the equivalent number of gyrations for ACW10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 are 105, 67, 58 and 107 respectively. The results also suggest that there is no significant difference in OBC except for ACW10, which is 0.6%. This shows that numbers of gyrations obtained are reasonable in comparing with 75 blows Marshall. 2006-10-20 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf Aziz Memon, Naeem (2006) Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering.
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic HE Transportation and Communications
TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements
spellingShingle HE Transportation and Communications
TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements
Aziz Memon, Naeem
Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
description The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on roads in developing countries like Malaysia. This has raised additional traffic, augmented axle loads and increased tire pressure on pavements designed for earlier era. In this regard, besides considering increasing the pavement thickness due to the traffic loads, steps must also be taken to extend the pavement life by using different compaction methods such as gyratory laboratory compaction method to have durable mix and better simulate field conditions. However, the main shortcoming of gyratory compaction method is that the gyratory compactor is very costly as seven times more than that of the available Marshall hammer.To overcome that shortcoming, studies have been done to compare both laboratory compaction methods but more are needed to verify different findings according to different conditions and climate. In this research four asphalt concrete mixes asphalt wearing course(ACW)10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 were designed using Marshall mix design to evaluate HMA properties such as density and air voids. Based on the Marshall results, specimens were fabricated to obtain the required number of gyrations that could produce same results in terms of density. Using the equivalent number of gyrations samples were designed using superpave to obtain the optimum bitumen content (OBC). The results indicate that at 75 blows Marshall, the equivalent number of gyrations for ACW10, ACW14, ACW20 and ACB28 are 105, 67, 58 and 107 respectively. The results also suggest that there is no significant difference in OBC except for ACW10, which is 0.6%. This shows that numbers of gyrations obtained are reasonable in comparing with 75 blows Marshall.
format Thesis
author Aziz Memon, Naeem
author_facet Aziz Memon, Naeem
author_sort Aziz Memon, Naeem
title Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_short Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_full Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_fullStr Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between superpave gyratory and Marshall laboratory compaction methods
title_sort comparison between superpave gyratory and marshall laboratory compaction methods
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/1/NaeemAzizMemonMFKA2006.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/4984/
_version_ 1643644203600707584