Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments

The objective of this research study was to introduce concrete protective coatings which provide maximum resistance against chemical attacks. The admixtures-silica fume and fly ash were also used to enhance the impermeability of concrete to a greater extent. Tests conducted at various stages of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bibi, Tayyaba, Mirza, Jahangir, Khan, Saba, Hamid, Humna, Fida, Zanib, Md. Tahir, Mahmood
Format: Article
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53931/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.53931
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.539312017-11-01T04:16:59Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53931/ Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments Bibi, Tayyaba Mirza, Jahangir Khan, Saba Hamid, Humna Fida, Zanib Md. Tahir, Mahmood TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The objective of this research study was to introduce concrete protective coatings which provide maximum resistance against chemical attacks. The admixtures-silica fume and fly ash were also used to enhance the impermeability of concrete to a greater extent. Tests conducted at various stages of the curing process allowed us to study the destructive and non-destructive strengths of the specimens. The mortar samples were coated with three different types of epoxy coatings and bitumen. They were then subjected to different chemical environments by immersing them in 10% standard solutions of each ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride and sulphuric acid. Drop in strength as a result of chemical exposure was considered as a measure of chemical attack. This was achieved by measuring the drop in compressive strength after 14 and 28 days of chemical exposure. The compressive strength results following chemical exposure indicated that the samples containing silica fume and fly ash (5% replacement of each by weight of cement) and the protective coating Epoxy-2 (E-2) proved to be more resistant to attacks. The control sample (without admixtures) showed a much greater degree of deterioration. Therefore, the application of E-2 coating in addition to silica fume and fly ash was invariably much more effective in improving the compressive strength as well as the resistance of concrete against chemical attacks. The results also indicated that among all the aggressive attacks, the sulphate environment has the most adverse effect on concrete in terms of lowering its strength. Penerbit UTM Press 2015 Article PeerReviewed Bibi, Tayyaba and Mirza, Jahangir and Khan, Saba and Hamid, Humna and Fida, Zanib and Md. Tahir, Mahmood (2015) Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments. Jurnal Teknologi, 74 (4). pp. 183-189. ISSN 0127-9696
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Bibi, Tayyaba
Mirza, Jahangir
Khan, Saba
Hamid, Humna
Fida, Zanib
Md. Tahir, Mahmood
Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
description The objective of this research study was to introduce concrete protective coatings which provide maximum resistance against chemical attacks. The admixtures-silica fume and fly ash were also used to enhance the impermeability of concrete to a greater extent. Tests conducted at various stages of the curing process allowed us to study the destructive and non-destructive strengths of the specimens. The mortar samples were coated with three different types of epoxy coatings and bitumen. They were then subjected to different chemical environments by immersing them in 10% standard solutions of each ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride and sulphuric acid. Drop in strength as a result of chemical exposure was considered as a measure of chemical attack. This was achieved by measuring the drop in compressive strength after 14 and 28 days of chemical exposure. The compressive strength results following chemical exposure indicated that the samples containing silica fume and fly ash (5% replacement of each by weight of cement) and the protective coating Epoxy-2 (E-2) proved to be more resistant to attacks. The control sample (without admixtures) showed a much greater degree of deterioration. Therefore, the application of E-2 coating in addition to silica fume and fly ash was invariably much more effective in improving the compressive strength as well as the resistance of concrete against chemical attacks. The results also indicated that among all the aggressive attacks, the sulphate environment has the most adverse effect on concrete in terms of lowering its strength.
format Article
author Bibi, Tayyaba
Mirza, Jahangir
Khan, Saba
Hamid, Humna
Fida, Zanib
Md. Tahir, Mahmood
author_facet Bibi, Tayyaba
Mirza, Jahangir
Khan, Saba
Hamid, Humna
Fida, Zanib
Md. Tahir, Mahmood
author_sort Bibi, Tayyaba
title Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
title_short Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
title_full Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
title_fullStr Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
title_full_unstemmed Resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
title_sort resistance of concrete protective coatings in different chemical environments
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53931/
_version_ 1643653461626060800