Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals

In this paper,we compare the performance of spectrogram and new variation of multi-windows(WM)spectrogram for various digital modulated signals.The windows used in the MW spectrogram are conbination of Slepian sequences instead of using all the sequences.The comparison in the time-frequency represen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan Jo, Lynn, Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/1/Comparison_Between_Performance_Spectrogram_Multi-Window.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTMICC.2007.4448613
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.7142
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.71422010-06-01T15:49:36Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/ Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals Tan Jo, Lynn Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering In this paper,we compare the performance of spectrogram and new variation of multi-windows(WM)spectrogram for various digital modulated signals.The windows used in the MW spectrogram are conbination of Slepian sequences instead of using all the sequences.The comparison in the time-frequency representation is made in terms of main-lobe width(WLM)and peak to side-lobe ratio(PSLR)of the signals used.In the presence of noise,performance is compared in terms of variance in the estimated from the instantaneous frequency.Bit duration and frequency are estimated from the time-frequency the instantaneous frequency(IF),which is derived from the time-frequency representation.The bias in the estimated bit duration is also calculated to compare the performance between spectrogram and WM spectrogram. In general,the time-frequency representation for the spectrogram is better than WM spectrogram.However,WM spectrogram is superior to spectrogram in terms of bit duration estimation. 2007 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/1/Comparison_Between_Performance_Spectrogram_Multi-Window.pdf Tan Jo, Lynn and Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri (2007) Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals. In: Proceeding of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Telecomunication and Malaysia International Conference on Communication, 14th-17th May 2007, Penang,Malaysia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTMICC.2007.4448613
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Tan Jo, Lynn
Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri
Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
description In this paper,we compare the performance of spectrogram and new variation of multi-windows(WM)spectrogram for various digital modulated signals.The windows used in the MW spectrogram are conbination of Slepian sequences instead of using all the sequences.The comparison in the time-frequency representation is made in terms of main-lobe width(WLM)and peak to side-lobe ratio(PSLR)of the signals used.In the presence of noise,performance is compared in terms of variance in the estimated from the instantaneous frequency.Bit duration and frequency are estimated from the time-frequency the instantaneous frequency(IF),which is derived from the time-frequency representation.The bias in the estimated bit duration is also calculated to compare the performance between spectrogram and WM spectrogram. In general,the time-frequency representation for the spectrogram is better than WM spectrogram.However,WM spectrogram is superior to spectrogram in terms of bit duration estimation.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Tan Jo, Lynn
Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri
author_facet Tan Jo, Lynn
Sha'ameri, Ahmad Zuri
author_sort Tan Jo, Lynn
title Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
title_short Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
title_full Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
title_fullStr Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
title_sort comparison between the performance of spectrogram and multi-window spectrogram in digital modulated communication signals
publishDate 2007
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/1/Comparison_Between_Performance_Spectrogram_Multi-Window.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTMICC.2007.4448613
_version_ 1643644710066061312