Modelling and optimisation of Eurycoma longifolia extraction utilising a recirculating flow extractor

In this study, Tongkat Ali was extracted with a newly designed recirculating flow extractor with temperature and flow rate as the operating parameters. The optimum duration and ratio for extraction were found to be 90 min and 40:1 w/w, respectively. The determination of optimal operating parameter v...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Mohtar, Mohd Ajib, Kumaresan, Sivakumar, Sarmidi, Mohamad Roji, Abdul Aziz, Ramlan
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: Asian Network for Scientific Information 2007
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7562/1/Mohamad_Roji_Sarmidi_2007_Modelling_and_Optimisation_of_Eurycoma.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/7562/
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:In this study, Tongkat Ali was extracted with a newly designed recirculating flow extractor with temperature and flow rate as the operating parameters. The optimum duration and ratio for extraction were found to be 90 min and 40:1 w/w, respectively. The determination of optimal operating parameter value for this extractor was based on maximum percentage extract yield and solid diffusivity, Ds,. From the experiments, it was found that the temperature and flow rate that produce the highest yield and solid diffusivity value were at 90°C and 400 rpm (22.47 mL sec-1), respectively. The optimal operating parameter values were used to compare the recirculating flow extractor performance with a batch extraction at 90°C. The comparison showed that the batch extraction was able to extract more rapidly than the recirculating flow extractor. The solid diffusivity, Ds, value for the batch extraction was found to be is 3.12 × 10-11 m2 sec-1 while the recirculating flow extractor had a solid diffusivity, Ds, value of 2.98×10-11 m2 sec-1 which indicated the difference in extraction rate. However, by utilizing the recirculating flow extractor, a higher final yield than batch extraction was produced which is 7.70% (w/w) for the recirculating flow extractor and 6.67% (w/w) for the batch extraction. This is possibly caused by the higher rates of solvent losses through evaporation for batch extraction.