Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis

This research investigates on the numerical methods for computing the greatest common divisors (GCD) of two polynomials in the orthogonal basis without having to convert to the power series form. Previous implementations were conducted using the Gauss Elimination with partial pivoting (GEPP) and QR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isa, S. N. A., Aris, N., Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S.
Format: Article
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/80919/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.603
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.80919
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.809192021-02-23T03:06:08Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/80919/ Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis Isa, S. N. A. Aris, N. Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S. QA Mathematics This research investigates on the numerical methods for computing the greatest common divisors (GCD) of two polynomials in the orthogonal basis without having to convert to the power series form. Previous implementations were conducted using the Gauss Elimination with partial pivoting (GEPP) and QR Householder algorithms, respectively. This work proceeds to seek for a better approximate solution by comparing the results of the implementations with the QR with column pivoting (QRCP) algorithm. The results reveal that QRCP is as competent as the GEPP algorithm, up to a certain degree, giving a reasonably good approximate solution. It is also found that normalizing the columns of the associated coefficient matrix slightly reduces the condition number of the matrix but has no significant effect on the GCD solutions when applying the GEPP and QR Householder algorithms. However equilibration of the columns by computing its ∞-norm is capable to improve the solution when QRCP is applied. Comparing the three algorithms on some test problems, QR Householder outperforms the rest and is able to give a good approximate solution in the worst case condition when the smallest element of the matrix is 1, the entries ranging up to 15 digits integers. Penerbit UTM Press 2017 Article PeerReviewed Isa, S. N. A. and Aris, N. and Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S. (2017) Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 13 (2). ISSN 2289-5981 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.603 DOI: 10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.603
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Isa, S. N. A.
Aris, N.
Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S.
Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
description This research investigates on the numerical methods for computing the greatest common divisors (GCD) of two polynomials in the orthogonal basis without having to convert to the power series form. Previous implementations were conducted using the Gauss Elimination with partial pivoting (GEPP) and QR Householder algorithms, respectively. This work proceeds to seek for a better approximate solution by comparing the results of the implementations with the QR with column pivoting (QRCP) algorithm. The results reveal that QRCP is as competent as the GEPP algorithm, up to a certain degree, giving a reasonably good approximate solution. It is also found that normalizing the columns of the associated coefficient matrix slightly reduces the condition number of the matrix but has no significant effect on the GCD solutions when applying the GEPP and QR Householder algorithms. However equilibration of the columns by computing its ∞-norm is capable to improve the solution when QRCP is applied. Comparing the three algorithms on some test problems, QR Householder outperforms the rest and is able to give a good approximate solution in the worst case condition when the smallest element of the matrix is 1, the entries ranging up to 15 digits integers.
format Article
author Isa, S. N. A.
Aris, N.
Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S.
author_facet Isa, S. N. A.
Aris, N.
Mohd. Taha, A. Z. S.
author_sort Isa, S. N. A.
title Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
title_short Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
title_full Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
title_fullStr Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the GCD of certain types of polynomials in the Chebyshev basis
title_sort analysis and comparison of numerical algorithms for finding the gcd of certain types of polynomials in the chebyshev basis
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/80919/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v13n2.603
_version_ 1693725932222676992