Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)

Landslides are a manifestation of slope instability causing different kinds of damage affecting life and property. Therefore, high-performance-based landslide prediction models are useful to government institutions for developing strategies for landslide hazard prevention and mitigation. Development...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong, Haoyuan, Liu, Junzhi, Bui, Dieu Tien, Pradhan, Biswajeet, Acharya, Tri Dev, Pham, Binh Thai, Zhu, A-Xing, Chen, Wei, Ahmad, Baharin
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.3463
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.85666
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.856662020-07-07T05:16:35Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85666/ Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China) Hong, Haoyuan Liu, Junzhi Bui, Dieu Tien Pradhan, Biswajeet Acharya, Tri Dev Pham, Binh Thai Zhu, A-Xing Chen, Wei Ahmad, Baharin G70.212-70.215 Geographic information system Landslides are a manifestation of slope instability causing different kinds of damage affecting life and property. Therefore, high-performance-based landslide prediction models are useful to government institutions for developing strategies for landslide hazard prevention and mitigation. Development of data mining based algorithms shows that high-performance models can be obtained using ensemble frameworks. The primary objective of this study is to investigate and compare the use of current state-of-the-art ensemble techniques, such as AdaBoost, Bagging, and Rotation Forest, for landslide susceptibility assessment with the base classifier of J48 Decision Tree (JDT). The Guangchang district (Jiangxi province, China) was selected as the case study. Firstly, a landslide inventory map with 237 landslide locations was constructed; the landslide locations were then randomly divided into a ratio of 70/30 for the training and validating models. Secondly, fifteen landslide conditioning factors were prepared, such as slope, aspect, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), sediment transport index (STI), plan curvature, profile curvature, lithology, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, land use, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and rainfall. Relief-F with the 10-fold cross-validation method was applied to quantify the predictive ability of the conditioning factors and for feature selection. Using the JDT and its three ensemble techniques, a total of four landslide susceptibility models were constructed. Finally, the overall performance of the resulting models was assessed and compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and statistical indexes. The result showed that all landslide models have high performance (AUC > 0.8). However, the JDT with the Rotation Forest model presents the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.855), followed by the JDT with the AdaBoost (0.850), the Bagging (0.839), and the JDT (0.814), respectively. Therefore, the result demonstrates that the JDT with Rotation Forest is the best optimized model in this study and it can be considered as a promising method for landslide susceptibility mapping in similar cases for better accuracy. Elsevier B.V. 2018 Article PeerReviewed Hong, Haoyuan and Liu, Junzhi and Bui, Dieu Tien and Pradhan, Biswajeet and Acharya, Tri Dev and Pham, Binh Thai and Zhu, A-Xing and Chen, Wei and Ahmad, Baharin (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena, 163 . pp. 399-413. ISSN 0341-8162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.3463
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic G70.212-70.215 Geographic information system
spellingShingle G70.212-70.215 Geographic information system
Hong, Haoyuan
Liu, Junzhi
Bui, Dieu Tien
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Acharya, Tri Dev
Pham, Binh Thai
Zhu, A-Xing
Chen, Wei
Ahmad, Baharin
Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
description Landslides are a manifestation of slope instability causing different kinds of damage affecting life and property. Therefore, high-performance-based landslide prediction models are useful to government institutions for developing strategies for landslide hazard prevention and mitigation. Development of data mining based algorithms shows that high-performance models can be obtained using ensemble frameworks. The primary objective of this study is to investigate and compare the use of current state-of-the-art ensemble techniques, such as AdaBoost, Bagging, and Rotation Forest, for landslide susceptibility assessment with the base classifier of J48 Decision Tree (JDT). The Guangchang district (Jiangxi province, China) was selected as the case study. Firstly, a landslide inventory map with 237 landslide locations was constructed; the landslide locations were then randomly divided into a ratio of 70/30 for the training and validating models. Secondly, fifteen landslide conditioning factors were prepared, such as slope, aspect, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), sediment transport index (STI), plan curvature, profile curvature, lithology, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, land use, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and rainfall. Relief-F with the 10-fold cross-validation method was applied to quantify the predictive ability of the conditioning factors and for feature selection. Using the JDT and its three ensemble techniques, a total of four landslide susceptibility models were constructed. Finally, the overall performance of the resulting models was assessed and compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and statistical indexes. The result showed that all landslide models have high performance (AUC > 0.8). However, the JDT with the Rotation Forest model presents the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.855), followed by the JDT with the AdaBoost (0.850), the Bagging (0.839), and the JDT (0.814), respectively. Therefore, the result demonstrates that the JDT with Rotation Forest is the best optimized model in this study and it can be considered as a promising method for landslide susceptibility mapping in similar cases for better accuracy.
format Article
author Hong, Haoyuan
Liu, Junzhi
Bui, Dieu Tien
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Acharya, Tri Dev
Pham, Binh Thai
Zhu, A-Xing
Chen, Wei
Ahmad, Baharin
author_facet Hong, Haoyuan
Liu, Junzhi
Bui, Dieu Tien
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Acharya, Tri Dev
Pham, Binh Thai
Zhu, A-Xing
Chen, Wei
Ahmad, Baharin
author_sort Hong, Haoyuan
title Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
title_short Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
title_full Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
title_fullStr Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
title_full_unstemmed Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
title_sort landslide susceptibility mapping using j48 decision tree with adaboost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the guangchang area (china)
publisher Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/85666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.3463
_version_ 1674066190214889472