A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach

This study applied two feed-forward type computational methods to estimate the Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) of stabilized peat soil with natural filler and cement. For this purpose, experimental data was obtained via testing of 271 samples at different natural filler and cement mixture dosa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dehghanbanadaki, Ali, Khari, Mahdy, Arefnia, Ali, Ahmad, Kamarudin, Motamedi, Shervin
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87715/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0343-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.87715
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.877152020-11-30T13:09:27Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87715/ A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach Dehghanbanadaki, Ali Khari, Mahdy Arefnia, Ali Ahmad, Kamarudin Motamedi, Shervin TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This study applied two feed-forward type computational methods to estimate the Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) of stabilized peat soil with natural filler and cement. For this purpose, experimental data was obtained via testing of 271 samples at different natural filler and cement mixture dosages. The input parameters for the developed UCS (output) model were: 1) binder dosage, 2) coefficient of compressibility, 3) filler dosage, and 4) curing time. The model estimated the UCS through two types of feed-forward Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models that were trained with Particle Swarm Optimization (ANN-PSO) and Back Propagation (ANN-BP) learning algorithms. As a means to validate the precision of the model two performance indices i.e., coefficient of correlation (R 2 ) and Mean Square Error (MSE) were examined. Sensitivity analyses was also performed to investigate the influence of each input parameters and their contribution on estimating the output. Overall, the results showed that MSE (PSO) < MSE (BP) while R 2 (PSO) > R 2 (BP) ; suggesting that the ANN-PSO model better estimates the UCS compared to ANN-BP. In addition, on the account of sensitivity analysis, it is found that the binder and filler content were the two most influential factors whilst curing period was the least effective factor in predicting UCS. Springer Verlag 2019-04 Article PeerReviewed Dehghanbanadaki, Ali and Khari, Mahdy and Arefnia, Ali and Ahmad, Kamarudin and Motamedi, Shervin (2019) A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23 (4). pp. 1560-1572. ISSN 1226-7988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0343-4
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Dehghanbanadaki, Ali
Khari, Mahdy
Arefnia, Ali
Ahmad, Kamarudin
Motamedi, Shervin
A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
description This study applied two feed-forward type computational methods to estimate the Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) of stabilized peat soil with natural filler and cement. For this purpose, experimental data was obtained via testing of 271 samples at different natural filler and cement mixture dosages. The input parameters for the developed UCS (output) model were: 1) binder dosage, 2) coefficient of compressibility, 3) filler dosage, and 4) curing time. The model estimated the UCS through two types of feed-forward Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models that were trained with Particle Swarm Optimization (ANN-PSO) and Back Propagation (ANN-BP) learning algorithms. As a means to validate the precision of the model two performance indices i.e., coefficient of correlation (R 2 ) and Mean Square Error (MSE) were examined. Sensitivity analyses was also performed to investigate the influence of each input parameters and their contribution on estimating the output. Overall, the results showed that MSE (PSO) < MSE (BP) while R 2 (PSO) > R 2 (BP) ; suggesting that the ANN-PSO model better estimates the UCS compared to ANN-BP. In addition, on the account of sensitivity analysis, it is found that the binder and filler content were the two most influential factors whilst curing period was the least effective factor in predicting UCS.
format Article
author Dehghanbanadaki, Ali
Khari, Mahdy
Arefnia, Ali
Ahmad, Kamarudin
Motamedi, Shervin
author_facet Dehghanbanadaki, Ali
Khari, Mahdy
Arefnia, Ali
Ahmad, Kamarudin
Motamedi, Shervin
author_sort Dehghanbanadaki, Ali
title A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
title_short A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
title_full A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
title_fullStr A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
title_full_unstemmed A study on UCS of stabilized peat with natural filler: A computational estimation approach
title_sort study on ucs of stabilized peat with natural filler: a computational estimation approach
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/87715/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0343-4
_version_ 1685578978342993920