Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree
In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, pla...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
id |
my.utm.88728 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.887282020-12-29T04:17:15Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/ Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree Chen, Wei Zhao, Xia Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Khosravi, Khabat Chai, Huichan Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Lingyu Ma, Jianquan Chen, Yingtao Wang, Xiaojing Ahmad, Baharin Li, Renwei TH434-437 Quantity surveying In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, plan curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), distance to rivers, distance to faults, distance to roads, lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use. The importance of factors was assessed using correlation attribute evaluation method. Finally, the performance of three models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The validation process indicated that the EBF-LMT model acquired the highest AUC for the training (84.7%) and validation (76.5%) datasets, followed by EBF-LR and EBF models. Our result also confirmed that combination of a decision tree-logistic regression-based algorithm with a bivariate statistical model lead to enhance the prediction power of individual landslide models. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2019-06 Article PeerReviewed Chen, Wei and Zhao, Xia and Shahabi, Himan and Shirzadi, Ataollah and Khosravi, Khabat and Chai, Huichan and Zhang, Shuai and Zhang, Lingyu and Ma, Jianquan and Chen, Yingtao and Wang, Xiaojing and Ahmad, Baharin and Li, Renwei (2019) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree. Geocarto International, 34 (11). pp. 1177-1201. ISSN 1010-6049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 DOI:10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
TH434-437 Quantity surveying |
spellingShingle |
TH434-437 Quantity surveying Chen, Wei Zhao, Xia Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Khosravi, Khabat Chai, Huichan Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Lingyu Ma, Jianquan Chen, Yingtao Wang, Xiaojing Ahmad, Baharin Li, Renwei Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
description |
In this study, we introduced novel hybrid of evidence believe function (EBF) with logistic regression (EBF-LR) and logistic model tree (EBF-LMT) for landslide susceptibility modelling. Fourteen conditioning factors were selected, including slope aspect, elevation, slope angle, profile curvature, plan curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), distance to rivers, distance to faults, distance to roads, lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use. The importance of factors was assessed using correlation attribute evaluation method. Finally, the performance of three models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The validation process indicated that the EBF-LMT model acquired the highest AUC for the training (84.7%) and validation (76.5%) datasets, followed by EBF-LR and EBF models. Our result also confirmed that combination of a decision tree-logistic regression-based algorithm with a bivariate statistical model lead to enhance the prediction power of individual landslide models. |
format |
Article |
author |
Chen, Wei Zhao, Xia Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Khosravi, Khabat Chai, Huichan Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Lingyu Ma, Jianquan Chen, Yingtao Wang, Xiaojing Ahmad, Baharin Li, Renwei |
author_facet |
Chen, Wei Zhao, Xia Shahabi, Himan Shirzadi, Ataollah Khosravi, Khabat Chai, Huichan Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Lingyu Ma, Jianquan Chen, Yingtao Wang, Xiaojing Ahmad, Baharin Li, Renwei |
author_sort |
Chen, Wei |
title |
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
title_short |
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
title_full |
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
title_fullStr |
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
title_sort |
spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree |
publisher |
Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88728/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 |
_version_ |
1687393612947521536 |