Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor

Comparison studies in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor (HPMR)system was investigated by using Reactive Black 5 (RB5)as target pollutant under UVA light irradiation. To achieve this aim, hybrid TiO2/clinoptilolite (TCP)photocatalyst powder was prepared by solid-state dispersion (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dzinun, Hazlini, Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan, Ismail, A. F.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88990/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.118
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.88990
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.889902021-01-26T08:36:29Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88990/ Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor Dzinun, Hazlini Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan Ismail, A. F. TP Chemical technology Comparison studies in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor (HPMR)system was investigated by using Reactive Black 5 (RB5)as target pollutant under UVA light irradiation. To achieve this aim, hybrid TiO2/clinoptilolite (TCP)photocatalyst powder was prepared by solid-state dispersion (SSD)methods and embedded at the outer layer of dual layer hollow fiber (DLHF)membranes fabricated via single step co-spinning process. TiO2 and CP photocatalyst were also used as control samples. The samples were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersion of X-ray (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD)and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)analyses. The result shows that TCP was actively functioned as photocatalyst in suspension system and 86% of RB5 photocatalytic degradation achieved within 60 min; however the additional step is required to separate the catalyst with treated water. In the HPMR system, even though the RB5 photocatalytic degradation exhibits lower efficiency however the rejection of RB5 was achieved up to 95% under UV irradiation due to the properties of photocatalytic membranes. The well dispersed of TCP at the outer layer of DLHF membrane have improved the surface affinity of DL-TCP membrane towards water, exhibit the highest pure water flux of 41.72 L/m2.h compared to DL-TiO2 membrane. In general, CP can help on improving photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in suspension, increased the RB5 removal and the permeability of DLHF membrane in HPMR system as well. Elsevier Ltd. 2019-08 Article PeerReviewed Dzinun, Hazlini and Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan and Ismail, A. F. (2019) Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor. Chemosphere, 228 . pp. 241-248. ISSN 0045-6535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.118 DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.118
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Dzinun, Hazlini
Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan
Ismail, A. F.
Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
description Comparison studies in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor (HPMR)system was investigated by using Reactive Black 5 (RB5)as target pollutant under UVA light irradiation. To achieve this aim, hybrid TiO2/clinoptilolite (TCP)photocatalyst powder was prepared by solid-state dispersion (SSD)methods and embedded at the outer layer of dual layer hollow fiber (DLHF)membranes fabricated via single step co-spinning process. TiO2 and CP photocatalyst were also used as control samples. The samples were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersion of X-ray (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD)and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)analyses. The result shows that TCP was actively functioned as photocatalyst in suspension system and 86% of RB5 photocatalytic degradation achieved within 60 min; however the additional step is required to separate the catalyst with treated water. In the HPMR system, even though the RB5 photocatalytic degradation exhibits lower efficiency however the rejection of RB5 was achieved up to 95% under UV irradiation due to the properties of photocatalytic membranes. The well dispersed of TCP at the outer layer of DLHF membrane have improved the surface affinity of DL-TCP membrane towards water, exhibit the highest pure water flux of 41.72 L/m2.h compared to DL-TiO2 membrane. In general, CP can help on improving photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in suspension, increased the RB5 removal and the permeability of DLHF membrane in HPMR system as well.
format Article
author Dzinun, Hazlini
Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan
Ismail, A. F.
author_facet Dzinun, Hazlini
Othman, Mohd. Hafiz Dzarfan
Ismail, A. F.
author_sort Dzinun, Hazlini
title Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
title_short Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
title_full Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
title_fullStr Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
title_full_unstemmed Photocatalytic performance of TiO2/Clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
title_sort photocatalytic performance of tio2/clinoptilolite: comparison study in suspension and hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactor
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88990/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.118
_version_ 1690370953669771264