Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant

Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorpti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muherei, Mazen Ahmed, Junin, Radzuan
Format: Article
Published: Modern Applied Science 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/8959/
http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/2503 -
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.8959
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.89592018-03-07T21:06:05Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/8959/ Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant Muherei, Mazen Ahmed Junin, Radzuan TP Chemical technology Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorption and/or partitioning on adsorbents impairs their effectiveness to solubilize/mobilize and reduce the oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) which renders contaminant remediation process economically unfeasible. In this research anionic (SDS) and nonionic (TX100) surfactants and their mixtures (1:2, 1:1, 2:1; TX100:SDS mass ratios) were evaluated for their ability to reduce surfactant CMCs, partitioning losses to an organic phase and/or adsorption to shale. Result showed that all mixtures behave similarly and have superior properties than both single surfactants. Partitioning and adsorption of TX100 into organic phase (Sarapar147) and shale were decreased by mixing with anionic surfactant (SDS). The data showed a 40% reduction in surfactant losses due to adsorption to shale and around 60% reduction due to both partitioning and adsorption. Modern Applied Science 2008 Article PeerReviewed Muherei, Mazen Ahmed and Junin, Radzuan (2008) Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant. Modern Applied Science, 2 (3). pp. 3-12. ISSN 1913-1844 (Print); 1913-1852 (Electronic) http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/2503 -
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Muherei, Mazen Ahmed
Junin, Radzuan
Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
description Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorption and/or partitioning on adsorbents impairs their effectiveness to solubilize/mobilize and reduce the oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) which renders contaminant remediation process economically unfeasible. In this research anionic (SDS) and nonionic (TX100) surfactants and their mixtures (1:2, 1:1, 2:1; TX100:SDS mass ratios) were evaluated for their ability to reduce surfactant CMCs, partitioning losses to an organic phase and/or adsorption to shale. Result showed that all mixtures behave similarly and have superior properties than both single surfactants. Partitioning and adsorption of TX100 into organic phase (Sarapar147) and shale were decreased by mixing with anionic surfactant (SDS). The data showed a 40% reduction in surfactant losses due to adsorption to shale and around 60% reduction due to both partitioning and adsorption.
format Article
author Muherei, Mazen Ahmed
Junin, Radzuan
author_facet Muherei, Mazen Ahmed
Junin, Radzuan
author_sort Muherei, Mazen Ahmed
title Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
title_short Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
title_full Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
title_fullStr Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
title_full_unstemmed Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
title_sort mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
publisher Modern Applied Science
publishDate 2008
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/8959/
http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/2503 -
_version_ 1643645087796690944