A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review
This paper presents a comparative study of methods building condition assessment used in Asian countries. The following methods were compared: a Malaysia method to assess buildings condition, an Indian, Hong Kong and Singapore method about buildings condition assessment and the assessment methods. T...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/1/NoorNabilahSarbini2019_AComparativeofBuildingCondition.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/ https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012029 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.utm.90070 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.900702021-03-29T05:57:57Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/ A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review Tajol Anuar, M. Z. Sarbini, N. N. Ibrahim, I. S. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This paper presents a comparative study of methods building condition assessment used in Asian countries. The following methods were compared: a Malaysia method to assess buildings condition, an Indian, Hong Kong and Singapore method about buildings condition assessment and the assessment methods. The comparative analysis included three tasks. First, every approach was described separately. Then, the main features of the methods were compared. Finally, some guidelines to improve or strengthen the Malaysia method were drawn. Main differences of the methods are the objectives and scope of the assessment, the assessment criteria, the type final results obtained and type of surveyor. The main similarities are that the assessment is carried out mainly by visual inspection method, the scope of inspection had to assess structural element and the tools developed for its implementation. Malaysia method should maintain the present assessment model, suggests a website to manage the entire assessment procedure such as document form related to assessment, checklist and guideline. Thus, the summary of this paper shall improvise Malaysia method from perspective defect process or factor, Non Destructive Test (NDT) test procedure and selection of the concrete repair material. 2019 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/1/NoorNabilahSarbini2019_AComparativeofBuildingCondition.pdf Tajol Anuar, M. Z. and Sarbini, N. N. and Ibrahim, I. S. (2019) A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review. In: 10th Asia Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference 2018, 13-15 Nov 2018, Langkawi, Malaysia. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012029 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
spellingShingle |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Tajol Anuar, M. Z. Sarbini, N. N. Ibrahim, I. S. A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
description |
This paper presents a comparative study of methods building condition assessment used in Asian countries. The following methods were compared: a Malaysia method to assess buildings condition, an Indian, Hong Kong and Singapore method about buildings condition assessment and the assessment methods. The comparative analysis included three tasks. First, every approach was described separately. Then, the main features of the methods were compared. Finally, some guidelines to improve or strengthen the Malaysia method were drawn. Main differences of the methods are the objectives and scope of the assessment, the assessment criteria, the type final results obtained and type of surveyor. The main similarities are that the assessment is carried out mainly by visual inspection method, the scope of inspection had to assess structural element and the tools developed for its implementation. Malaysia method should maintain the present assessment model, suggests a website to manage the entire assessment procedure such as document form related to assessment, checklist and guideline. Thus, the summary of this paper shall improvise Malaysia method from perspective defect process or factor, Non Destructive Test (NDT) test procedure and selection of the concrete repair material. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Tajol Anuar, M. Z. Sarbini, N. N. Ibrahim, I. S. |
author_facet |
Tajol Anuar, M. Z. Sarbini, N. N. Ibrahim, I. S. |
author_sort |
Tajol Anuar, M. Z. |
title |
A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
title_short |
A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
title_full |
A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
title_fullStr |
A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
title_sort |
comparative of building condition assessment method used in asia countries: a review |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/1/NoorNabilahSarbini2019_AComparativeofBuildingCondition.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/90070/ https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012029 |
_version_ |
1696976257036582912 |