Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3

Biometric systems such as signature verification are highly viable in order to identify individuals in organizations or in finance divisions. Advancement in classification of images using deep learning networks has opened an opportunity for this problem. In this study, the largest available handwrit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jahandad, Jahandad, Mohd. Sam, S., Kamardin, K., Sjarif, N. N. A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.147
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
id my.utm.91874
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.918742021-07-28T08:48:26Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91874/ Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3 Jahandad, Jahandad Mohd. Sam, S. Kamardin, K. Sjarif, N. N. A. TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Biometric systems such as signature verification are highly viable in order to identify individuals in organizations or in finance divisions. Advancement in classification of images using deep learning networks has opened an opportunity for this problem. In this study, the largest available handwritten signature dataset, namely, the GPDS Synthetic Signature Database, was employed for the classification of signatures of 1000 users, each of which having 24 original (or genuine) signatures, and 30 forged (or fake) signatures. Moreover, two popular GoogLeNet architecture versions of CNN, namely, Inception-v1 and Inception-v3, were used. Firstly, algorithms were trained on samples from 20 users, and achieved a validation accuracy of 83% for Inception-v1 and 75% for Inception-v3. In terms of Equal Error Rates (EER), Inception-v1 managed to obtain an EER as low as 17 for 20 users; while EER for Inception-v3 with 20 users obtained 24, which is a good measure compared to prior works in the literature. Although Inception-v3 has performed better in the ImageNet image classification challenge, in the case of 2D images of signatures, Inception-v1 has performed the classification task better than Inception-v3 It is also acknowledged in this study that Inception-v1 spent less time training, as it had a lower number of operations compared to Inception-v3. Elsevier Ltd. 2019 Article PeerReviewed Jahandad, Jahandad and Mohd. Sam, S. and Kamardin, K. and Sjarif, N. N. A. (2019) Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3. Procedia Computer Science, 161 . pp. 475-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.147 DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.147
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Jahandad, Jahandad
Mohd. Sam, S.
Kamardin, K.
Sjarif, N. N. A.
Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
description Biometric systems such as signature verification are highly viable in order to identify individuals in organizations or in finance divisions. Advancement in classification of images using deep learning networks has opened an opportunity for this problem. In this study, the largest available handwritten signature dataset, namely, the GPDS Synthetic Signature Database, was employed for the classification of signatures of 1000 users, each of which having 24 original (or genuine) signatures, and 30 forged (or fake) signatures. Moreover, two popular GoogLeNet architecture versions of CNN, namely, Inception-v1 and Inception-v3, were used. Firstly, algorithms were trained on samples from 20 users, and achieved a validation accuracy of 83% for Inception-v1 and 75% for Inception-v3. In terms of Equal Error Rates (EER), Inception-v1 managed to obtain an EER as low as 17 for 20 users; while EER for Inception-v3 with 20 users obtained 24, which is a good measure compared to prior works in the literature. Although Inception-v3 has performed better in the ImageNet image classification challenge, in the case of 2D images of signatures, Inception-v1 has performed the classification task better than Inception-v3 It is also acknowledged in this study that Inception-v1 spent less time training, as it had a lower number of operations compared to Inception-v3.
format Article
author Jahandad, Jahandad
Mohd. Sam, S.
Kamardin, K.
Sjarif, N. N. A.
author_facet Jahandad, Jahandad
Mohd. Sam, S.
Kamardin, K.
Sjarif, N. N. A.
author_sort Jahandad, Jahandad
title Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
title_short Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
title_full Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
title_fullStr Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
title_full_unstemmed Offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
title_sort offline signature verification using deep learning convolutional neural network (cnn) architectures googlenet inception-v1 and inception-v3
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.147
_version_ 1706957006301036544