Investigation of light non-aqueous phase liquid penetration in double-porosity using physical experiment and computer simulation

• Main Authors: Abd. Rashid, M. F., Alias, N., Ahmad, K., Sa'Ari, R., Tsai, F. T. C., Ramli, M. Z., Ibrahim, Z., Jumain, M., Jamal, M. H., Abu Bakar, A., Shahrin, Muhammad Irfan
• Format: Conference or Workshop Item
• Language: English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
• Online Access: http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/96267/1/MuhammadIrfan2021_InvestigationofLightNonAqueousPhase.pdf; http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/96267/; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/646/1/012032
• Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Groundwater resources benefits to human activity for developing country. Groundwater contamination is crucial, particularly due to the amount of leakage and spillage of hydrocarbon liquids such as light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs), resulting in contaminated the groundwater and unsafe for domestic and agriculture activities. Penetration of hydrocarbon liquids into groundwater can be seen through double-porosity soil. Therefore, this paper investigates the penetration of LNAPLs in double-porosity soil using computer modelling to calibrate and validate from physical experiment data. These computer modelling and physical experiment studies discuss the pattern and rate of LNAPL penetrations by employing PetraSim commercial software and digital image processing technique (DIPT) by using acrylic glass cylinder, mirror and Nikon D90 digital camera. The LNAPL volume of 70 ml and 150 ml were poured instantaneously onto the surface of soil sample for calibration and validation purposes. The penetration pattern in double-porosity were monitored and recorded using digital camera at pre-determine time intervals. The images were processed using Surfer software and Matlab routine to plot the LNAPL penetration pattern. PetraSim simulation was used to calibrate and validate the penetration of LNAPL through double-porosity soil with physical experiment data. As a result, the PetraSim results valid with the physical experiment results. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency results more than 0.50 with percentage of differences for calibration and validation are 1.34% and 5.47% between physical experiment and PetraSim simulation. As a conclusion, PetraSim simulation can be used for further investigation on LNAPL penetration through subsurface soil.