Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines

With a worldwide aging pipeline infrastructure and increasing economic and regulatory constraints for pipeline operators, pipeline integrity issues need to be solved. While pipeline regulations not only demand inspections or monitoring of structural integrity at certain intervals, but a continuous p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albarody, T.M.B., Taufiq, M.B.
Format: Article
Published: Asian Research Publishing Network 2016
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009187902&partnerID=40&md5=aee6717bbfbdb0de7f94905e5d1e981c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/25329/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Petronas
id my.utp.eprints.25329
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.253292021-08-27T12:58:34Z Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines Albarody, T.M.B. Taufiq, M.B. With a worldwide aging pipeline infrastructure and increasing economic and regulatory constraints for pipeline operators, pipeline integrity issues need to be solved. While pipeline regulations not only demand inspections or monitoring of structural integrity at certain intervals, but a continuous process of verification of pipeline integrity and fitness-for-purpose. In-Field Linear Hose (IFL) offer complemented solution for both maximizing pipeline integrity preventing; corrosion, wear, leakage etc. as well as, a health monitoring tool. IFL has short rehabilitation times and rapid recommissioning, and thus represents not only an inexpensive alternative to open rehabilitation, but also a high-quality method for the renewal of pressure petroleum pipes with an anti-corroded solution. Although, IFL structure can be coiled or uncoiled several times, it embedded optical fibre for health monitoring tool assessing pipeline integrity by inspecting the pipe corrosion, metal loss, deformations, and position. Technical Acceptance Assurance for IFL� over its 20 years of design life are key deliverables of this study. Whereas, IFL failure mode is typically caused by a succession of defects or degradation that leads to loss of structural integrity. IFL Collapse, Burst, Tensile failure, Torsional failure, Fatigue failure, and Erosion are failure mechanisms expected cause potential IFL failure and need to scrutinize. This paper focuses on wrinkling of IFL under verities loading, deformation and its interaction with the outer pipe. Stresses and strains will scrutinized throughout the deformation stage, detecting possible detachment of the liner from the outer pipe and minimum loads induce wrinkles. © 2006-2016 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved. Asian Research Publishing Network 2016 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009187902&partnerID=40&md5=aee6717bbfbdb0de7f94905e5d1e981c Albarody, T.M.B. and Taufiq, M.B. (2016) Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (24). pp. 14248-14252. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/25329/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description With a worldwide aging pipeline infrastructure and increasing economic and regulatory constraints for pipeline operators, pipeline integrity issues need to be solved. While pipeline regulations not only demand inspections or monitoring of structural integrity at certain intervals, but a continuous process of verification of pipeline integrity and fitness-for-purpose. In-Field Linear Hose (IFL) offer complemented solution for both maximizing pipeline integrity preventing; corrosion, wear, leakage etc. as well as, a health monitoring tool. IFL has short rehabilitation times and rapid recommissioning, and thus represents not only an inexpensive alternative to open rehabilitation, but also a high-quality method for the renewal of pressure petroleum pipes with an anti-corroded solution. Although, IFL structure can be coiled or uncoiled several times, it embedded optical fibre for health monitoring tool assessing pipeline integrity by inspecting the pipe corrosion, metal loss, deformations, and position. Technical Acceptance Assurance for IFL� over its 20 years of design life are key deliverables of this study. Whereas, IFL failure mode is typically caused by a succession of defects or degradation that leads to loss of structural integrity. IFL Collapse, Burst, Tensile failure, Torsional failure, Fatigue failure, and Erosion are failure mechanisms expected cause potential IFL failure and need to scrutinize. This paper focuses on wrinkling of IFL under verities loading, deformation and its interaction with the outer pipe. Stresses and strains will scrutinized throughout the deformation stage, detecting possible detachment of the liner from the outer pipe and minimum loads induce wrinkles. © 2006-2016 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
format Article
author Albarody, T.M.B.
Taufiq, M.B.
spellingShingle Albarody, T.M.B.
Taufiq, M.B.
Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
author_facet Albarody, T.M.B.
Taufiq, M.B.
author_sort Albarody, T.M.B.
title Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
title_short Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
title_full Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
title_fullStr Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
title_full_unstemmed Technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
title_sort technical acceptance assurance limit of ifl� pipelines
publisher Asian Research Publishing Network
publishDate 2016
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009187902&partnerID=40&md5=aee6717bbfbdb0de7f94905e5d1e981c
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/25329/
_version_ 1738656714793680896