A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials

The manufacture and use of building materials result in numerous environmental concerns in the construction industry. Green building materials (GBMs) are environmentally friendly compared to their traditional counterparts. However, identifying the criteria for selecting GBMs and assessing their sust...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Atesh, E.A., Rahmawati, Y., Zawawi, N.A.W.A., Utomo, C.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109381820&doi=10.1080%2f15623599.2021.1944548&partnerID=40&md5=f41dc0b5a785d6e150337110d679375f
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29508/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Petronas
id my.utp.eprints.29508
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.295082022-03-25T02:08:06Z A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials Al-Atesh, E.A. Rahmawati, Y. Zawawi, N.A.W.A. Utomo, C. The manufacture and use of building materials result in numerous environmental concerns in the construction industry. Green building materials (GBMs) are environmentally friendly compared to their traditional counterparts. However, identifying the criteria for selecting GBMs and assessing their sustainability have been challenging. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used to decide between selecting steel building structure and reinforced concrete (RC) building structure as an alternative. In the first phase, the criteria for selecting GBMs were identified through literature review, experts� opinions, and questionnaire survey. In the second phase, the purposive sampling technique was used to select experts and professionals in materials selection to compare the different GBMs criteria and also, to compare and weight the provided alternatives. The findings of this study identified that 29 criteria were ranked using a scatter plot of means and standard deviation scores. Besides, the results indicated that RC building structure, with a weight value of 0.5225, was a better alternative to steel building structure. Additionally, the results show that the environmental and economic criteria are more important than the social criteria. This study, therefore, developed a decision-making model for helping stakeholders to select materials required to achieve sustainable buildings. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2021 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109381820&doi=10.1080%2f15623599.2021.1944548&partnerID=40&md5=f41dc0b5a785d6e150337110d679375f Al-Atesh, E.A. and Rahmawati, Y. and Zawawi, N.A.W.A. and Utomo, C. (2021) A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials. International Journal of Construction Management . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29508/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description The manufacture and use of building materials result in numerous environmental concerns in the construction industry. Green building materials (GBMs) are environmentally friendly compared to their traditional counterparts. However, identifying the criteria for selecting GBMs and assessing their sustainability have been challenging. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used to decide between selecting steel building structure and reinforced concrete (RC) building structure as an alternative. In the first phase, the criteria for selecting GBMs were identified through literature review, experts� opinions, and questionnaire survey. In the second phase, the purposive sampling technique was used to select experts and professionals in materials selection to compare the different GBMs criteria and also, to compare and weight the provided alternatives. The findings of this study identified that 29 criteria were ranked using a scatter plot of means and standard deviation scores. Besides, the results indicated that RC building structure, with a weight value of 0.5225, was a better alternative to steel building structure. Additionally, the results show that the environmental and economic criteria are more important than the social criteria. This study, therefore, developed a decision-making model for helping stakeholders to select materials required to achieve sustainable buildings. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
format Article
author Al-Atesh, E.A.
Rahmawati, Y.
Zawawi, N.A.W.A.
Utomo, C.
spellingShingle Al-Atesh, E.A.
Rahmawati, Y.
Zawawi, N.A.W.A.
Utomo, C.
A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
author_facet Al-Atesh, E.A.
Rahmawati, Y.
Zawawi, N.A.W.A.
Utomo, C.
author_sort Al-Atesh, E.A.
title A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
title_short A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
title_full A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
title_fullStr A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
title_full_unstemmed A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
title_sort decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publishDate 2021
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109381820&doi=10.1080%2f15623599.2021.1944548&partnerID=40&md5=f41dc0b5a785d6e150337110d679375f
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29508/
_version_ 1738656975689875456