Review on EEG and ERP predictive biomarkers for major depressive disorder

Abstract The selection of suitable antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has been challenging and is mainly based on subjective assessments that include minimal scientific evidence. Objective measures that are extracted from neuroimaging modalities such as electroencephalograms (EEGs)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mumtaz, W., Malik, A.S., Yasin, M.A.M., Xia, L.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2015
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84937690679&doi=10.1016%2fj.bspc.2015.07.003&partnerID=40&md5=5f828a3fd9d98222092cd0121da59257
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/31486/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Description
Summary:Abstract The selection of suitable antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has been challenging and is mainly based on subjective assessments that include minimal scientific evidence. Objective measures that are extracted from neuroimaging modalities such as electroencephalograms (EEGs) could be a potential solution to this problem. This approach is achieved by the successful prediction of antidepressant treatment efficacy early in the patient's care. EEG-based relevant research studies have shown promising results. These studies are based on derived measures from EEG and event-related potentials (ERPs), which are called neurophysiological predictive biomarkers for MDD. This paper seeks to provide a detailed review on such research studies along with their possible limitations. In addition, this paper provides a comparison of these methods based on EEG/ERP common datasets from MDD and healthy controls. This paper also proposes recommendations to improve these methods, e.g., EEG integration with other modalities such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalograms (MEG), to achieve better evidence of the efficacy than EEG alone, to eventually improve the treatment selection process. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.