Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study

This study develops an Adaboost-GIS model for flood susceptibility mapping and evaluates its relative performance by undertaking a comparative assessment of the machine learning model with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and soft computing models integrated with GIS. An Analytic Hierarchy Proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balogun, A.-L., Sheng, T.Y., Sallehuddin, M.H., Aina, Y.A., Dano, U.L., Pradhan, B., Yekeen, S., Tella, A.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130606737&doi=10.1080%2f10106049.2022.2076910&partnerID=40&md5=96c3345d3cba70741cb4bb892185f466
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33201/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Petronas
id my.utp.eprints.33201
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.332012022-07-06T08:20:54Z Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study Balogun, A.-L. Sheng, T.Y. Sallehuddin, M.H. Aina, Y.A. Dano, U.L. Pradhan, B. Yekeen, S. Tella, A. This study develops an Adaboost-GIS model for flood susceptibility mapping and evaluates its relative performance by undertaking a comparative assessment of the machine learning model with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and soft computing models integrated with GIS. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytic Network Process (ANP), Fuzzy-AHP, Fuzzy-ANP and AdaBoost machine learning models were developed and integrated with GIS to classify the susceptibility of the study area. Out of 70 sample validation locations, Adaboost�s performance was the best with a 95.72 similarity match with very high and high susceptibility locations followed by F-ANP, ANP, F-AHP and AHP with 95.65, 92.75, 81.42 and 77.14 similarity matches, respectively. It also had the highest AUC (0.864). Thus, the Adaboost machine learning, Fuzzy computing and conventional MCDM models can be adopted by stakeholders for accurately assessing flood susceptibility, thereby fostering safe and resilient cities. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2022 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130606737&doi=10.1080%2f10106049.2022.2076910&partnerID=40&md5=96c3345d3cba70741cb4bb892185f466 Balogun, A.-L. and Sheng, T.Y. and Sallehuddin, M.H. and Aina, Y.A. and Dano, U.L. and Pradhan, B. and Yekeen, S. and Tella, A. (2022) Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study. Geocarto International . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33201/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description This study develops an Adaboost-GIS model for flood susceptibility mapping and evaluates its relative performance by undertaking a comparative assessment of the machine learning model with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and soft computing models integrated with GIS. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytic Network Process (ANP), Fuzzy-AHP, Fuzzy-ANP and AdaBoost machine learning models were developed and integrated with GIS to classify the susceptibility of the study area. Out of 70 sample validation locations, Adaboost�s performance was the best with a 95.72 similarity match with very high and high susceptibility locations followed by F-ANP, ANP, F-AHP and AHP with 95.65, 92.75, 81.42 and 77.14 similarity matches, respectively. It also had the highest AUC (0.864). Thus, the Adaboost machine learning, Fuzzy computing and conventional MCDM models can be adopted by stakeholders for accurately assessing flood susceptibility, thereby fostering safe and resilient cities. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
format Article
author Balogun, A.-L.
Sheng, T.Y.
Sallehuddin, M.H.
Aina, Y.A.
Dano, U.L.
Pradhan, B.
Yekeen, S.
Tella, A.
spellingShingle Balogun, A.-L.
Sheng, T.Y.
Sallehuddin, M.H.
Aina, Y.A.
Dano, U.L.
Pradhan, B.
Yekeen, S.
Tella, A.
Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
author_facet Balogun, A.-L.
Sheng, T.Y.
Sallehuddin, M.H.
Aina, Y.A.
Dano, U.L.
Pradhan, B.
Yekeen, S.
Tella, A.
author_sort Balogun, A.-L.
title Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
title_short Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
title_full Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
title_fullStr Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
title_sort assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publishDate 2022
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130606737&doi=10.1080%2f10106049.2022.2076910&partnerID=40&md5=96c3345d3cba70741cb4bb892185f466
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33201/
_version_ 1738657469409787904