Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors

Purpose The main purpose of the study is to examine the influence of family directors on the firm performance of public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia. This study provides empirical evidence on the agency problems between controlling shareholders and minority interests in the concentrated owner...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kamardin, Hasnah
Other Authors: Said, Roshima
Format: Book Section
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/14773/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320140000006002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
id my.uum.repo.14773
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.147732016-04-18T01:26:55Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/14773/ Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors Kamardin, Hasnah HD28 Management. Industrial Management Purpose The main purpose of the study is to examine the influence of family directors on the firm performance of public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia. This study provides empirical evidence on the agency problems between controlling shareholders and minority interests in the concentrated ownership setting. Design/methodology/approach Samples of the study are 112 PLCs in year 2006. Two measures of firm performance are used: return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. Managerial ownership refers to the percentage shareholdings of executive directors with direct and indirect holdings. It was further categorized into family ownership and non-family ownership.Findings In relation to ROA, managerial ownership is found positively significant. The results also show that the positive relationship between managerial ownership is contributed by the managerial-non-family ownership. In relation to Tobin’s Q, the results show a U-shape with turning point at 31.38% for managerial ownership and 28.29% for the managerial-family ownership. The results found significant and positive relationships between managerial ownership and both measures of firm performance which indicates that managerial ownership and family ownership yield greater efficiency.Research implications The study highlights the effects of corporate governance on ROA and Tobin’s Q are somewhat different. It provides some evidence on the need to use appropriate measure of firm performance. The significant relationship supports the argument of Chami (1999), Fama and Jensen (1983), and DeAngelo and DeAngelo (1985) and empirical evidence of Lee (2004) that family ownership enhances monitoring activities.Originality/value Differentiating the types of managerial ownership into family and non-family categories enriches our knowledge about who actually contributes to the improved performance. Emerald Group Publishing Limited Said, Roshima Crowther, David Amran, Azlan 2014 Book Section PeerReviewed Kamardin, Hasnah (2014) Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors. In: Ethics, Governance and Corporate Crime: Challenges and Consequences. Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, 6 (Vol.6). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 47-83. ISBN 978-1-78350-673-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320140000006002
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
topic HD28 Management. Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Kamardin, Hasnah
Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
description Purpose The main purpose of the study is to examine the influence of family directors on the firm performance of public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia. This study provides empirical evidence on the agency problems between controlling shareholders and minority interests in the concentrated ownership setting. Design/methodology/approach Samples of the study are 112 PLCs in year 2006. Two measures of firm performance are used: return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. Managerial ownership refers to the percentage shareholdings of executive directors with direct and indirect holdings. It was further categorized into family ownership and non-family ownership.Findings In relation to ROA, managerial ownership is found positively significant. The results also show that the positive relationship between managerial ownership is contributed by the managerial-non-family ownership. In relation to Tobin’s Q, the results show a U-shape with turning point at 31.38% for managerial ownership and 28.29% for the managerial-family ownership. The results found significant and positive relationships between managerial ownership and both measures of firm performance which indicates that managerial ownership and family ownership yield greater efficiency.Research implications The study highlights the effects of corporate governance on ROA and Tobin’s Q are somewhat different. It provides some evidence on the need to use appropriate measure of firm performance. The significant relationship supports the argument of Chami (1999), Fama and Jensen (1983), and DeAngelo and DeAngelo (1985) and empirical evidence of Lee (2004) that family ownership enhances monitoring activities.Originality/value Differentiating the types of managerial ownership into family and non-family categories enriches our knowledge about who actually contributes to the improved performance.
author2 Said, Roshima
author_facet Said, Roshima
Kamardin, Hasnah
format Book Section
author Kamardin, Hasnah
author_sort Kamardin, Hasnah
title Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
title_short Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
title_full Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
title_fullStr Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
title_full_unstemmed Managerial ownership and firm performance: The influence of family directors and non-family directors
title_sort managerial ownership and firm performance: the influence of family directors and non-family directors
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
publishDate 2014
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/14773/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320140000006002
_version_ 1644281543666958336