Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran

The legal position applicable in Malaysia based on the decision of Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v Boonsom Boonyanit [2001] 2 CLJ 133 is that the right of the original owners of a land title is not fully protected if the property was transferred to another party by means of fraud, provided the new owner...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harun, Noraida, Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/1/UUMJLS%20%206%201%20%202015%20100-117.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/
http://www.uumjls.uum.edu.my/index.php/previous-issues/143-uum-journal-of-legal-studies-jls-vol-6-2015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.25145
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.251452018-11-11T02:53:34Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/ Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran Harun, Noraida Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi KZ Law of Nations The legal position applicable in Malaysia based on the decision of Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v Boonsom Boonyanit [2001] 2 CLJ 133 is that the right of the original owners of a land title is not fully protected if the property was transferred to another party by means of fraud, provided the new owner (buyer) has acquired ownership with bona fide (good faith) with consideration. The original owner is not legally entitled to recover the land from the new buyer. In other words, with this decision even though the conversion of ownership was obtained by fraud, if the registered buyer is a bona fide purchaser, the ownership is undeniable.The decision of this case became a binding precedent to all courts in Malaysia and the principle in this case can only be restored or corrected by another decision of the Federal Court. In 2010, the case of Tan Yin Hong v Tan Sian San [2010] 2 CLJ 269 which was decided by the Federal Court was a landmark case which revised the legal principles applied in Adorna Properties.The legal position after the decision of the case in 2010 clearly shows that the original owner has undeniable ownership and has the right to reposses the land when fraud is proven.This purpose of the article is to study the position and the remedy of the bona fide purchaser when the decision in favor of the landowner which may invite injustice to the bona fide purchaser as they solely depending on the document title when dealing with transfer of land matters.The methodology used in this study is a library based research which includes document analysis such as the decided cased, books and articles. This study also raises suggestions of improvement and outcome to ensure the interests and rights of the parties involved. UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/1/UUMJLS%20%206%201%20%202015%20100-117.pdf Harun, Noraida and Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi (2015) Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 6. pp. 100-117. ISSN 2229-984X http://www.uumjls.uum.edu.my/index.php/previous-issues/143-uum-journal-of-legal-studies-jls-vol-6-2015
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic KZ Law of Nations
spellingShingle KZ Law of Nations
Harun, Noraida
Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi
Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
description The legal position applicable in Malaysia based on the decision of Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v Boonsom Boonyanit [2001] 2 CLJ 133 is that the right of the original owners of a land title is not fully protected if the property was transferred to another party by means of fraud, provided the new owner (buyer) has acquired ownership with bona fide (good faith) with consideration. The original owner is not legally entitled to recover the land from the new buyer. In other words, with this decision even though the conversion of ownership was obtained by fraud, if the registered buyer is a bona fide purchaser, the ownership is undeniable.The decision of this case became a binding precedent to all courts in Malaysia and the principle in this case can only be restored or corrected by another decision of the Federal Court. In 2010, the case of Tan Yin Hong v Tan Sian San [2010] 2 CLJ 269 which was decided by the Federal Court was a landmark case which revised the legal principles applied in Adorna Properties.The legal position after the decision of the case in 2010 clearly shows that the original owner has undeniable ownership and has the right to reposses the land when fraud is proven.This purpose of the article is to study the position and the remedy of the bona fide purchaser when the decision in favor of the landowner which may invite injustice to the bona fide purchaser as they solely depending on the document title when dealing with transfer of land matters.The methodology used in this study is a library based research which includes document analysis such as the decided cased, books and articles. This study also raises suggestions of improvement and outcome to ensure the interests and rights of the parties involved.
format Article
author Harun, Noraida
Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi
author_facet Harun, Noraida
Hassim, Jady @ Zaidi
author_sort Harun, Noraida
title Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
title_short Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
title_full Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
title_fullStr Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
title_full_unstemmed Pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: Isu dan cabaran
title_sort pembeli bona fide dalam penipuan tanah: isu dan cabaran
publisher UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies
publishDate 2015
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/1/UUMJLS%20%206%201%20%202015%20100-117.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/25145/
http://www.uumjls.uum.edu.my/index.php/previous-issues/143-uum-journal-of-legal-studies-jls-vol-6-2015
_version_ 1644284239860989952