Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the relationship between internal corporate governance mechanisms and board performance in monitoring roles.Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was used to gather data on board performance, while annual reports were employed to gather data on i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamardin, Hasnah, Haron, Hasnah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/1/JFRA%209%202%202011%20119%20140.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/
http://doi.org/10.1108/19852511111173095
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.27389
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.273892020-08-26T13:52:15Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/ Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia Kamardin, Hasnah Haron, Hasnah HF5601 Accounting Purpose – This paper aims to examine the relationship between internal corporate governance mechanisms and board performance in monitoring roles.Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was used to gather data on board performance, while annual reports were employed to gather data on internal corporate governance mechanisms. Data for board performance were based on 112 directors who represent the companies. Findings – Factor analysis extracted two dimensions of monitoring roles: management oversight roles and performance evaluation roles. Non-independent non-executive directors and managerial ownership were found to be positively related to both dimensions of monitoring roles, while the multiple directorships of non-executive directors were negatively related to management oversight roles.Practical implications – The paper establishes the need for regulators to pay particular attention to multiple directorships, which are commonly practiced in public listed companies. The contribution of non-independent non-executive directors rather than independent directors in monitoring roles calls for further research. Regulators need to emphasize the performance evaluation roles of the board of directors (BOD), as much emphasis has been given to management oversight roles.Originality/value – The study contributes to the literature concerning monitoring roles as it shows that management oversight roles and performance evaluation roles are differentiated. The findings provide an avenue for the contribution of non-independent non-executive directors and multiple directorships in monitoring roles. Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/1/JFRA%209%202%202011%20119%20140.pdf Kamardin, Hasnah and Haron, Hasnah (2011) Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 9 (2). pp. 119-140. ISSN 1985-2517 http://doi.org/10.1108/19852511111173095 doi:10.1108/19852511111173095
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic HF5601 Accounting
spellingShingle HF5601 Accounting
Kamardin, Hasnah
Haron, Hasnah
Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
description Purpose – This paper aims to examine the relationship between internal corporate governance mechanisms and board performance in monitoring roles.Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was used to gather data on board performance, while annual reports were employed to gather data on internal corporate governance mechanisms. Data for board performance were based on 112 directors who represent the companies. Findings – Factor analysis extracted two dimensions of monitoring roles: management oversight roles and performance evaluation roles. Non-independent non-executive directors and managerial ownership were found to be positively related to both dimensions of monitoring roles, while the multiple directorships of non-executive directors were negatively related to management oversight roles.Practical implications – The paper establishes the need for regulators to pay particular attention to multiple directorships, which are commonly practiced in public listed companies. The contribution of non-independent non-executive directors rather than independent directors in monitoring roles calls for further research. Regulators need to emphasize the performance evaluation roles of the board of directors (BOD), as much emphasis has been given to management oversight roles.Originality/value – The study contributes to the literature concerning monitoring roles as it shows that management oversight roles and performance evaluation roles are differentiated. The findings provide an avenue for the contribution of non-independent non-executive directors and multiple directorships in monitoring roles.
format Article
author Kamardin, Hasnah
Haron, Hasnah
author_facet Kamardin, Hasnah
Haron, Hasnah
author_sort Kamardin, Hasnah
title Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
title_short Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
title_full Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
title_fullStr Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: Evidence from Malaysia
title_sort internal corporate governance and board performance in monitoring roles: evidence from malaysia
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
publishDate 2011
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/1/JFRA%209%202%202011%20119%20140.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/27389/
http://doi.org/10.1108/19852511111173095
_version_ 1677783827372572672