Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns

This study examined the announcement effects for acquirers from the years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problems and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aimed to investigate three major objectives namely the effects of family control, blockhol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ishak, Norhamiza, Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham, Shahar, Hanita Kadir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/1/PJSSH%2028%203%202020%202325%202341.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/
http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-5328-2019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.28197
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.281972021-02-18T02:16:48Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/ Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns Ishak, Norhamiza Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham Shahar, Hanita Kadir HG Finance This study examined the announcement effects for acquirers from the years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problems and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aimed to investigate three major objectives namely the effects of family control, blockholder activism, and board structures on the stock performance of acquirers. In addressing these objectives, the three-day abnormal returns one day before the announcements were adopted as the proxy for the announcement effects. Ordinary least squares regression methods were used to examine the effects of the 10 factors on abnormal returns. The results show that acquisitions in Malaysia were value-enhancing, which is consistent with the synergistic theory. Family ownership and active institutional blockholders were able to create value which implies that family-controlled firms do not engage in opportunistic behavior. Moreover, institutional blockholders should play an active role if they want to protect their investments. The study has implications on regulators such as the Securities Commission (SC) with regards to board composition in which independent directors should consist of at least one-third of it because such composition leads to more significant values. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/1/PJSSH%2028%203%202020%202325%202341.pdf Ishak, Norhamiza and Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham and Shahar, Hanita Kadir (2020) Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28 (3). pp. 2325-2341. ISSN 0128-7702 http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-5328-2019
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic HG Finance
spellingShingle HG Finance
Ishak, Norhamiza
Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham
Shahar, Hanita Kadir
Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
description This study examined the announcement effects for acquirers from the years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problems and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aimed to investigate three major objectives namely the effects of family control, blockholder activism, and board structures on the stock performance of acquirers. In addressing these objectives, the three-day abnormal returns one day before the announcements were adopted as the proxy for the announcement effects. Ordinary least squares regression methods were used to examine the effects of the 10 factors on abnormal returns. The results show that acquisitions in Malaysia were value-enhancing, which is consistent with the synergistic theory. Family ownership and active institutional blockholders were able to create value which implies that family-controlled firms do not engage in opportunistic behavior. Moreover, institutional blockholders should play an active role if they want to protect their investments. The study has implications on regulators such as the Securities Commission (SC) with regards to board composition in which independent directors should consist of at least one-third of it because such composition leads to more significant values.
format Article
author Ishak, Norhamiza
Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham
Shahar, Hanita Kadir
author_facet Ishak, Norhamiza
Taufil Mohd, Kamarun Nisham
Shahar, Hanita Kadir
author_sort Ishak, Norhamiza
title Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
title_short Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
title_full Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
title_fullStr Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
title_full_unstemmed Effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
title_sort effects of ownership and board structures on acquisitions returns
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
publishDate 2020
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/1/PJSSH%2028%203%202020%202325%202341.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/28197/
http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-5328-2019
_version_ 1692994207283675136