The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?

The recurring conflict in Eastern DRC has had devastating effects on civilians, mostly in Kivus. From the beginning of January 2002 till the end of May 2017, many conflict resolution efforts have been put together by regional and international communities. However, there has not been any sustainable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maeresera, Sadiki, Rugeje, Engelbert Abel, Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/1/JIS%2014%202018%2037-49.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.29043
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.290432023-01-01T08:28:53Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/ The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility? Maeresera, Sadiki Rugeje, Engelbert Abel Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa JZ International relations The recurring conflict in Eastern DRC has had devastating effects on civilians, mostly in Kivus. From the beginning of January 2002 till the end of May 2017, many conflict resolution efforts have been put together by regional and international communities. However, there has not been any sustainable mechanism to resolve the conflict. The situation regarding the security of Eastern Congo continues to be volatile. This paper seeks to identify the responsible party that would help mitigate the recurring conflict in Eastern Congo. Using the three distinct categories of actors in Conflict Transformation, the paper argues that the lack of coordination among these actors who constitutes the three Track levels have affected unity of purpose and the level of commitment as far as transforming the Eastern Congo Conflict. The divergent interests among the respective actors to outmaneuver one another when it comes to agenda setting regarding respective peace initiatives on conflict, could be the rationale behind the absence of a workable formula in transforming conflict in the Eastern DRC. The paper proffer strategic policy suggestions toward a workable Conflict Transformation mechanism that equitably addresses the root causes of the conflict and fairly incorporates the relevant stakeholders in an effort to find a sustainable solution. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/1/JIS%2014%202018%2037-49.pdf Maeresera, Sadiki and Rugeje, Engelbert Abel and Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa (2018) The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility? Journal of International Studies (JIS), 14. pp. 37-49. ISSN 1823-691X
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic JZ International relations
spellingShingle JZ International relations
Maeresera, Sadiki
Rugeje, Engelbert Abel
Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa
The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
description The recurring conflict in Eastern DRC has had devastating effects on civilians, mostly in Kivus. From the beginning of January 2002 till the end of May 2017, many conflict resolution efforts have been put together by regional and international communities. However, there has not been any sustainable mechanism to resolve the conflict. The situation regarding the security of Eastern Congo continues to be volatile. This paper seeks to identify the responsible party that would help mitigate the recurring conflict in Eastern Congo. Using the three distinct categories of actors in Conflict Transformation, the paper argues that the lack of coordination among these actors who constitutes the three Track levels have affected unity of purpose and the level of commitment as far as transforming the Eastern Congo Conflict. The divergent interests among the respective actors to outmaneuver one another when it comes to agenda setting regarding respective peace initiatives on conflict, could be the rationale behind the absence of a workable formula in transforming conflict in the Eastern DRC. The paper proffer strategic policy suggestions toward a workable Conflict Transformation mechanism that equitably addresses the root causes of the conflict and fairly incorporates the relevant stakeholders in an effort to find a sustainable solution.
format Article
author Maeresera, Sadiki
Rugeje, Engelbert Abel
Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa
author_facet Maeresera, Sadiki
Rugeje, Engelbert Abel
Zengeni, Knocks Tapiwa
author_sort Maeresera, Sadiki
title The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
title_short The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
title_full The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
title_fullStr The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
title_full_unstemmed The Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Recurring Conflict: Whose Conflict Transformation Responsibility?
title_sort eastern democratic republic of congo recurring conflict: whose conflict transformation responsibility?
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
publishDate 2018
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/1/JIS%2014%202018%2037-49.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29043/
_version_ 1754532469066956800