Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix

Organizational ambidexterity refers to the firm's capacity to simultaneously exploit existing product offerings with familiar knowledge and explore new product opportunities with unfamiliar knowledge. Due to this definition, ambidexterity has been commonly studied at inter-new product developme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/1/JTOM%2012%2001%202017%2032-42.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jtom/article/view/jtom2017.12.1.4
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.29517
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.295172023-06-04T08:53:53Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/ Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal T Technology (General) Organizational ambidexterity refers to the firm's capacity to simultaneously exploit existing product offerings with familiar knowledge and explore new product opportunities with unfamiliar knowledge. Due to this definition, ambidexterity has been commonly studied at inter-new product development (NPD) level. As such, studies at the intra-NPD (in a single NPD) are still rare. Although both exploitative and explorative are critical capabilities for NPDs, with limited resources at hands, most firms will have to do a trade-off between them. As a result, while some firms preferred exploitative NPD, some others have adventured into explorative NPD. Therefore, a single NPD project is the feasible option to most firms at any one time. Although quality is the focus in exploitative NPD, while innovation is the emphasis in explorative NPD, both are imperative to any types of NPD. Thus, it was suggested firm that is capable of creating balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD will be more successful than the others at sustaining competitive advantage. However, creating a balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD is a challenging effort. As a result, this article proposed a quality-innovation (Q-I) matrix to demonstrate the concept of organizational ambidexterity for creating balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD. The Q-I matrix will enhance our understanding on the concept of organizational ambidexterity at intra-NPD level, which is still rarely studied in contrast to the inter-NPD level of analysis. UUM Press 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/1/JTOM%2012%2001%202017%2032-42.pdf Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal (2017) Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix. Journal of Technology and Operations Management (JTOM), 12 (1). pp. 32-42. ISSN 2590-4175 (Online) https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jtom/article/view/jtom2017.12.1.4 https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4 https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal
Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
description Organizational ambidexterity refers to the firm's capacity to simultaneously exploit existing product offerings with familiar knowledge and explore new product opportunities with unfamiliar knowledge. Due to this definition, ambidexterity has been commonly studied at inter-new product development (NPD) level. As such, studies at the intra-NPD (in a single NPD) are still rare. Although both exploitative and explorative are critical capabilities for NPDs, with limited resources at hands, most firms will have to do a trade-off between them. As a result, while some firms preferred exploitative NPD, some others have adventured into explorative NPD. Therefore, a single NPD project is the feasible option to most firms at any one time. Although quality is the focus in exploitative NPD, while innovation is the emphasis in explorative NPD, both are imperative to any types of NPD. Thus, it was suggested firm that is capable of creating balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD will be more successful than the others at sustaining competitive advantage. However, creating a balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD is a challenging effort. As a result, this article proposed a quality-innovation (Q-I) matrix to demonstrate the concept of organizational ambidexterity for creating balance between quality and innovation in a single NPD. The Q-I matrix will enhance our understanding on the concept of organizational ambidexterity at intra-NPD level, which is still rarely studied in contrast to the inter-NPD level of analysis.
format Article
author Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal
author_facet Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal
author_sort Ahmad Zaidi, Mohamad Faizal
title Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
title_short Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
title_full Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
title_fullStr Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
title_full_unstemmed Organizational Ambidexterity at Intra-NPD Level of Analysis with Quality-Innovation Matrix
title_sort organizational ambidexterity at intra-npd level of analysis with quality-innovation matrix
publisher UUM Press
publishDate 2017
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/1/JTOM%2012%2001%202017%2032-42.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29517/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jtom/article/view/jtom2017.12.1.4
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.12.1.4
_version_ 1768010696536096768