TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism

This study discusses the Federal Court judgment in the case of Director of Forest, Sarawak & Anor v. TR Sandah Tabau & Ors and other appeals [2017] 3 CLJ 1. The Federal Court’s decision was said to deviate from an earlier established principle of the common law recognition of existing indige...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan, Wook, Izawati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/1/UUMJLS%2015%2001%202024%201-21.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15180
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.30478
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.304782024-02-27T15:20:29Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/ TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan Wook, Izawati K Law (General) This study discusses the Federal Court judgment in the case of Director of Forest, Sarawak & Anor v. TR Sandah Tabau & Ors and other appeals [2017] 3 CLJ 1. The Federal Court’s decision was said to deviate from an earlier established principle of the common law recognition of existing indigenous peoples’ land rights, the content and extent of which are determined by community customary laws. The common law acknowledgement or recognition of indigenous peoples’ pre-existing rights to their traditional and customary lands held by the Federal Court in Adong bin Kuwau v Kerajaan Negeri Johor [1997] 1 MLJ 418 and Madeli Salleh v. Superintendent of Lands & Surveys & Anor [2005] 3 CLJ 697 complimented the existing safeguards given under the Federal Constitution and statutory laws relevant to Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether the Federal Court’s decision in TR Sandah FC reflects judicial conservatism by giving preference to statutory laws passed by the elected officials that resulted in the regression of the recognition of the indigenous peoples’ customary land rights. The method adopted in this study is a qualitative approach via doctrinal legal research. This is a text-based examination of legal texts and other scholarly materials. This shows judges in Malaysia are said to play a more conservative role in the interpretation of legislation. It would be fundamental to highlight the development of the judicial treatment of the indigenous peoples’ land rights in Malaysia and its implications. UUM Press 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/1/UUMJLS%2015%2001%202024%201-21.pdf Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan and Wook, Izawati (2024) TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism. UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS), 15 (1). pp. 1-21. ISSN 2229-984X https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15180 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan
Wook, Izawati
TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
description This study discusses the Federal Court judgment in the case of Director of Forest, Sarawak & Anor v. TR Sandah Tabau & Ors and other appeals [2017] 3 CLJ 1. The Federal Court’s decision was said to deviate from an earlier established principle of the common law recognition of existing indigenous peoples’ land rights, the content and extent of which are determined by community customary laws. The common law acknowledgement or recognition of indigenous peoples’ pre-existing rights to their traditional and customary lands held by the Federal Court in Adong bin Kuwau v Kerajaan Negeri Johor [1997] 1 MLJ 418 and Madeli Salleh v. Superintendent of Lands & Surveys & Anor [2005] 3 CLJ 697 complimented the existing safeguards given under the Federal Constitution and statutory laws relevant to Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether the Federal Court’s decision in TR Sandah FC reflects judicial conservatism by giving preference to statutory laws passed by the elected officials that resulted in the regression of the recognition of the indigenous peoples’ customary land rights. The method adopted in this study is a qualitative approach via doctrinal legal research. This is a text-based examination of legal texts and other scholarly materials. This shows judges in Malaysia are said to play a more conservative role in the interpretation of legislation. It would be fundamental to highlight the development of the judicial treatment of the indigenous peoples’ land rights in Malaysia and its implications.
format Article
author Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan
Wook, Izawati
author_facet Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan
Wook, Izawati
author_sort Ahmad Zubir, Nurulizwan
title TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
title_short TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
title_full TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
title_fullStr TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
title_full_unstemmed TR Sandah: Withering Judicial Activism
title_sort tr sandah: withering judicial activism
publisher UUM Press
publishDate 2024
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/1/UUMJLS%2015%2001%202024%201-21.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/30478/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15180
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.1
_version_ 1792158601529262080