Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations

The march of digitisation and technological adoption occurs in arbitration, exposing the arbitration centre to cybersecurity risks. The purpose of this study is to investigate the arbitral rules of the Asian International Arbitration Centre ("AIAC"), the Hong Kong International Arbitration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri, Mohamed, Khadijah, Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza, Mohamad, Ani Munirah
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/1/ICLAS%200101%202021%2053-55.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0poqMFC6s
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.31177
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.311772024-07-31T11:00:06Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/ Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri Mohamed, Khadijah Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza Mohamad, Ani Munirah K Law (General) The march of digitisation and technological adoption occurs in arbitration, exposing the arbitration centre to cybersecurity risks. The purpose of this study is to investigate the arbitral rules of the Asian International Arbitration Centre ("AIAC"), the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre ("HKIAC"), the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC"), and the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce ("SCC"), as well as the application of those rules by the parties and the tribunal. This article also analyses the efforts made by AIAC, HKIAC, ICC, and SCC outside of their specific arbitral rules, notably concerning technology use and cybersecurity protections. This study used a combination of qualitative research and a comparative analytic method. This research concludes that there is no provision in the arbitral rules of these four institutions for explicit cybersecurity measures. However, the parties and the arbitral tribunal are entitled to implement suitable cybersecurity safeguards. This study also discovered that these four organisations intend to guide cybersecurity measures outside of their arbitral rules 2021 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/1/ICLAS%200101%202021%2053-55.pdf Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri and Mohamed, Khadijah and Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza and Mohamad, Ani Munirah (2021) Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations. In: UiTM International Conference on Law & Society 2021, 1-2 November 2021, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0poqMFC6s
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri
Mohamed, Khadijah
Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza
Mohamad, Ani Munirah
Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
description The march of digitisation and technological adoption occurs in arbitration, exposing the arbitration centre to cybersecurity risks. The purpose of this study is to investigate the arbitral rules of the Asian International Arbitration Centre ("AIAC"), the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre ("HKIAC"), the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC"), and the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce ("SCC"), as well as the application of those rules by the parties and the tribunal. This article also analyses the efforts made by AIAC, HKIAC, ICC, and SCC outside of their specific arbitral rules, notably concerning technology use and cybersecurity protections. This study used a combination of qualitative research and a comparative analytic method. This research concludes that there is no provision in the arbitral rules of these four institutions for explicit cybersecurity measures. However, the parties and the arbitral tribunal are entitled to implement suitable cybersecurity safeguards. This study also discovered that these four organisations intend to guide cybersecurity measures outside of their arbitral rules
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri
Mohamed, Khadijah
Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza
Mohamad, Ani Munirah
author_facet Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri
Mohamed, Khadijah
Md Isa @ Yusuff, Yusramizza
Mohamad, Ani Munirah
author_sort Md. Nor, Mohd Zakhiri
title Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
title_short Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
title_full Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
title_fullStr Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
title_full_unstemmed Digitalisation of Arbitration, Cyber Security Risk and International Arbitration Centre: Some Observations
title_sort digitalisation of arbitration, cyber security risk and international arbitration centre: some observations
publishDate 2021
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/1/ICLAS%200101%202021%2053-55.pdf
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/31177/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0poqMFC6s
_version_ 1806452636368502784