Ngữ nghĩa và ngữ dụng học hay là mối quan hệ giữa cái chung và cái riêng
The relationship between semantics and pragmatics, which has been the focus of many debates and papers. One view is the recognition of a distinction between the two. hence the different scope of investigation. Semantics and pragmatics will be concerned with type vs. token, sentence vs. utterance, me...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Vietnamese |
| Published: |
Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/11126/6444 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Vietnam National University, Hanoi |
| Language: | Vietnamese |
| Summary: | The relationship between semantics and pragmatics, which has been the focus of many debates and papers. One view is the recognition of a distinction between the two. hence the different scope of investigation. Semantics and pragmatics will be concerned with type vs. token, sentence vs. utterance, meaning vs. use, linguistic meaning and speaker's meaning, explieature vs. implicature. respectively. Gazdar for instance, maintains that Pragmatics = semantics - truth conditions. In short, the distinction between semantics and pragmatics IS based on (a), linguistic* meaning as opposed to use, (b). truth - conditions vs. non-truth conditions, and (c). the role of context independence as against context dependence. Thus the dialectic between the two areas is not paid attention to. This papers offers a new look at the relationship between semantics and pragmatics from a philosophical perspective. According to this approach, what semantics is to pragmatics IS the general to the particular. There exists a dialectical relation between the two. Pragmatics IS simply a realization of semantics, or just an extension of semantics. |
|---|