A Critical Discourse Analysis of English Media Texts on Climate Change. M.A. Thesis Linguistics: 62 22 15 01
This study critically analyz ed how the power relation between the developed and developing countries a s well as the ideologies about these countries ‘ responsibilities for climate change were discursively constructed in The Independent and The New York Times‟ c...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Theses and Dissertations |
Language: | English |
Published: |
ĐHNN
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/39904 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Vietnam National University, Hanoi |
Language: | English |
Summary: | This
study
critically analyz
ed
how the power relation between the
developed and
developing
countries a
s well as
the ideologies
about
these
countries
‘ responsibilities
for climate change
were discursively constructed in
The Independent
and
The New
York Times‟
coverage
of the Conferences of the Parties to the UNFCCC between
2004 and 2013. The method of analysis was a qualitative critical discourse analysis
with the support of corpus techniq
ues.
The findings from the study showed
that
although the altering but consistent
ideologies were struggling with each other, they were all
importan
t
. Th
r
ee main
ideologies
were decoded
in response to the research questions
. First, both unity and
conflict
existed in the
power relation between the developed and developing
countries
at the global climate
conferences
, with the heavier weight on the conflict.
Second, t
he developed countries
seemed reluctant
and
indifferent towards their
responsibility for clima
te change
.
Third, t
he developing countries
were required to
take
responsibility for climate change
due to their rapid growth
but they still
demanded aid from the developed countries
.
Consequen
tl
y
, no consensus c
ould
be
reached on a common framework for cli
mate change, and the lengthy process of
global climate
conference
s yielded nothing but confusion and delayed action.
The linguistic
features of l
exical choice, lexical relation, metaphor,
passivization
,
nominalization and modality
we
re found ideologically
invested in the newspapers‘
portrayal of the
power
relation and
ideologies.
Also,
the ideologies and the language
features that convey
ed
these ideologies
we
re influenced by the two media outlets‘
political commitments,
news values,
news agenda,
and the so
cio
-
economic and
historical
background that embedded the discourse
. A
ll in all
, the media bolster
ed
the asymmetrical power nexus
and
the ideologies about the responsibilities for
climate change
in the interest of the developed nations. |
---|