Towards the constitutional democracy in Vietnam: an analysis of the constitutional amendment of 2013
The constitutional developments in Vietnam since “Doi moi” (Renovation) of 1986 show the trend of its transition towards the constitutional democracy. While maintaining the principles of socialist democracy, Vietnam has tried to adopt many new progressive democratic values. This is in line with th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/94071 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Vietnam National University, Hanoi |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The constitutional developments in Vietnam since “Doi moi” (Renovation) of 1986 show the trend of its
transition towards the constitutional democracy. While maintaining the principles of socialist democracy,
Vietnam has tried to adopt many new progressive democratic values. This is in line with the trend of
reforms in transitional democracies, especially in East Asian countries. However, compared to those
countries that have made strong reforms, Vietnam is still recognized to be the follower with little changes.
While comparing to the current socialist democracies like China, Vietnam has a clearer and more
progressive approach towards constitutional democracies instead of trying to build a separate model.1
This article aims to demonstrate the process of constitutional transformation through the analysis of
the 2013 Constitution. The approach of this paper does not follow the interpretation of a model of
constitutional democracy for Vietnam but instead proves the need, possibility, and value of Vietnam in
adopting more principles of constitutional democracies. The academic contribution of this study is to
affirm some previous studies about “the global constitution-making process”2 of Vietnam3, but is also to
argue that this process has not really brought significant changes to the constitutional democracy due to
the lack of a constitutional review mechanism to make the Constitution be enforced in society. |
---|